Advertisement
Trapattoni has managed Ireland for the past three years. Julien Behal/PA Wire/Press Association Images

Time for Trap to take the handbrake off

Trapattoni needs to adopt a style that encourages the type of football Ireland displayed in Paris two years ago if they are to gain favour in the eyes of the Irish public.

GLENN WHELAN MADE a telling assertion recently.

Speaking to RTÉ Sport, the combative midfielder spoke of Giovanni Trapattoni’s insistence on instilling a defensive mindset in his side.

Whelan claimed that every player in the side would prefer to play a more attractive brand of football, but outlined the reason for their negative approach as follows:

“You go out and you’re told by the manager what to do and if you don’t do that, there are other players waiting to come in.

“I think every player would like to get a little more forward and adventurous but if the manager wants you to do a role then you have to do it.”

There was more than a hint of reluctance in Whelan’s analysis of the ultra-pragmatic style that Trapattoni appears determined to impose on the Irish set-up.

While it is ironic that the player who is arguably most suited to this system seems somewhat nonplussed by its restrictions, his less-than-glowing assessment of Trap’s methods is echoed by a significant portion of the Irish public.

And the system he employs is as divisive as the man himself.

There are essentially two schools of thought when it comes to judging the Ireland boss.

  • His supporters rightly point out that he has resurrected Ireland from the doldrums of the Staunton era and introduced a level of discipline and professionalism into the side – a professionalism that was inconspicuous even in the peak years of the Charlton era, which were characterised by a work-hard-play-hard ethos.
  • However, Trapattoni’s detractors, while acknowledging the improvements he has made to the side, suggest flaws exist in his obstinate management style.

Despite his high wages, he rarely attends Premier League games – a factor exacerbated by his often eccentric team selections, in which a player’s form outside the Ireland set-up sometimes appears almost irrelevant.

Moreover, the Italian seems to actively discourage an excess of forward movement from anyone other than his wingers and strikers, in addition to promoting a philosophy in which possession is significantly less than nine-tenths of the law.

Fans who subscribe to Trap’s footballing worldview will claim Ireland aren’t good enough to play with a more positive attitude. However, the evidence of the Paris play-off – easily Ireland’s most positive and best performance under Trapattoni – contradicts such arguments.

There was a suggestion that, on this occasion, players bravely ignored Trapattoni, refusing for once to act on his instructions and instead adopting a more expansive style, without sacrificing the Italian’s core principles of discipline and organisation.

However, since then, Ireland have arguably receded and conformed to a playing style in which fear of the ball is the prevailing characteristic.

The Irish team will most likely adhere to this system against Estonia and could conceivably still qualify regardless.

Last month, they beat Armenia – who are arguably superior to Estonia – despite at times being out-passed by their opponents, as well as enjoying a large dose of luck during the game.

But even if Ireland qualify, they will face sides far superior to Estonia and Armenia next summer – sides with the ability to expose Trap’s rigid system as effortlessly as Russia did on two occasions during this qualifying campaign.

Consequently, Ireland’s prospective Euro 2012 qualification would likely prove to be a damp squib, more akin to the lows that the Irish rugby team’s 2007 World Cup performance prompted, rather than the highs of Italia 90.

Therefore, unless a radical alteration in style is imminently initiated, Trapattoni’s Ireland tenure is likely to end in an underwhelming fashion, remembered mainly for a few hollow victories against teams without the necessary skills to expose our frailties.

Oh well, we’ll always have Paris.

Read: Shay Given sits out Ireland squad training at Malahide>

Poll: Should Jon Walters start up front for Ireland?

Close
Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Simon O'Neill
    Favourite Simon O'Neill
    Report
    Nov 9th 2011, 11:26 AM

    “But even if Ireland qualify, they will face sides far superior to Estonia and Armenia next summer – sides with the ability to expose Trap’s rigid system as effortlessly as Russia did on two occasions during this qualifying campaign.”

    This article is as rigid in its presumptions as Trap’s system. If we do qualify – and here’s hoping we do – how do we know that Trapatonni will choose to play the exact same system he has employed for the qualifiers. The purpose of a qualification campaign is exactly that – to qualify – and he has got us to two successive play offs. Once we arrive at a tournament there will be a similar league phase and then a knockout section. There is no reason to presume Trap will blindly continue with the same game plan for every game, especially the knockout phases where we need to win the game outright.

    It’s also funny that the only way journalists can acknowledge the Paris display is to explain it away as an aberration that Trap had no responsibility for – while at the same time that are happy to blame him for every misplaced McGeady cross.

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Patrick Doyle
    Favourite Patrick Doyle
    Report
    Nov 9th 2011, 3:37 PM

    @simon..

    What? Trap man is suddenly going to go ossie ardilles on us once we qualify?? yeah right.. Qualify and get Martin O Neill in to take us to the finals

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.