The Score uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Two Louth fans found guilty of assaulting referee

A judge will sentence the pair, who attacked Martin Sludden at Croke Park in 2010, later today.

Ugly scenes at Croke Park in July 2010.
Ugly scenes at Croke Park in July 2010.
Image: ©INPHO/Donall Farmer

TWO MEN WHO were accused of attacking a GAA referee in July 2010 have been found guilty today, according to the RTE website.

Ugly scenes broke out at the final whistle of Louth and Meath’s Leinster Senior Football final at Croke Park nearly two years ago when referee Martin Sludden wrongly awarded Meath a winning goal in stoppage time.

Sludden was confronted by a number of fans before being hastily escorted off the field by Gardai and Joseph Conlon (23) and Paul Grimes (50), both from Dundalk, were charged with assault.

The pair denied the charges and Judge Bridget Reilly adjourned the case until today for legal submissions.

Sludden, who later admitted the error, withdrew his complaint and didn’t give evidence but Judge Reilly has found them both guilty and sentencing is due to take place this afternoon.

Watch footage of the incident below:



YouTube credit:

Call back: McBrearty set for second trial after impressing Aussie Rules scouts

‘We compete, and we compete to our ability’: Kilkenny footballers come to terms with Louth hammering

Read next:

Comments (26 Comments)

  • Good, this sends out a clear signal that this type of behaviour will not be tolerated. Irregardless of the circumstance no defence can be forwarded for such behaviour.

    Reply
  • It’s only a game. You go to enjoy it or moan about it and talk about it later with your friends. Not to act like an animal like those idiots they need to get a life.

    Reply
  • Well a few months in jail is the least they deserve,
    There’s no need for any of that sort of violence in sport

    Reply
  • Calling for replays for This and the Henry incident are laughable. If you look back at every GAA game which ends with less than a goal between the teams. A case can be made for a reply because the ref missed something. He might have gave a soft free or missed a lad takin an extra step. Its sport and at the end off the day these things happen. If it was kerry that lost to this goal there wouldn’t be a word over it. I’m not biased here by the way as a Cavan man. I hate too see Meath win anything.

    Reply
  • what a good day for referees and the GAA. How could they plead not guilty in the first instance is baffling. Might deter others.

    Reply
  • Rory 01/03/12 #

    Had to laugh at the guy attempt to hit the ref only to FAIL and nearly fall flat on his face. Way on your life.

    Reply
  • I thought it was an advert for hardy bucks they appear to be similar in every way

    Reply
  • They should be made tog out for the Kilkenny football team in their next match.
    Couldn’t be any worse….

    Reply
  • Whilst justice has to serve its course here, that referee was one of the worst I have ever seen. If he had ANY common sense he would have left the field of play immediately after the match. But he didn’t, he thought it more appropriate to stay on the field and enter into his little black book the name of a Louth player that was booked for rightfully protesting such a terrible decision. Louth where robbed that day and his ineptitude has led to today’s proceedings.

    Reply
    • Louth were robbed that day. As a Meathman I totally agree. However it was not the referee’s ineptitude that led to today’s proceedings. It was the idiocy and thuggishness of Conlon and Grimes that led to today’s proceedings. I’ve been at many GAA games where the referee made stupid, mind-boggling decisions – it never once occurred to me to enter the pitch and attack players, supporters or match officials.

      Reply
    • Fair enought Brian, however to take a step back from this for a minute, Louth where about to win their first leinster title, a one in a generation event, and the ref goes and does that. There can’t be many game that you have seen Mr Sludden officiate that have been so historically significant surely? I stand by my point respectfully, Mr Sludden’s ineptitude has caused all this…

      Reply
    • Chris chris chris your right again but the two tugs should have had more sense and not to attack the referee there have been many times Dublin have lost important matches due to bad refereeing i agree with some of your points but at the end of the day where did all that aggression get them i know louth hadn’t been in a leinster final in years but at the end of the day they didn’t deserve it THEY ARE SHITE

      Reply
  • Strange that the referee withdrew his statement etc……….

    Reply
  • Louth were robbed that day but two wrongs don’t make a right. Meath players had an opportunity to do the honourable thing and offer a replay but failed to show any honour whatsoever.

    Reply
    • Now that is as dumb a remark as I can imagine. Sport is sport and when the final whistle is blown that’s it; it’s over, gone, finito. On to the next game.

      The idea that one side should offer another a replay because of a disputed decision is off the wall.

      Reply
  • What i remember is the scandalous decision by meath not to offer a replay. That was bad form and wrong. Bastards.

    Reply
    • And what onus was on Meath to offer a replay, why should Meath have cleaned up a mess that GAA HQ couldn’t legislate for and still haven’t. Are Down bastards for not offering Kildare a replay in 2010 after a clear square ball? Are Dublin bastards for winning an All Ireland in 1995 when they had an illegal player on the field for some minutes? Are Kilkenny bastards for winning an All Ireland in 2009 after a dubious penalty decision? Or do you just have a thing about Meath? Decisions are sometimes good and sometimes awful, that is as a result of the officials not the teams on the field. Officials need to sort out and be sanctioned for problems caused by officials and teams sanctioned for problems caused by teams. If you think Louth would have acted any different if the roles were reversed then you are sorely mistaken and neither would Dublin Kerry Cork Tyrone or any other team in the same position.

      Reply
  • What punishment did the GAA give these two? Any bans from GAA events?

    Reply
  • The GAA need to change their name to the BOXING ASSOCIATION as this is typical behaviour of the players and supporters.

    Reply
  • Sludden made a mistake in allowing the goal, and another one by staying on the field after the game when he should have left straight away. He was barely touched by the two clowns, who I’m not defending. Worse assaults happen every day, and nothing is done about it. This case was a waste of Garda, court and everyone else’s time.

    Reply
  • Back in the late 90s, diddnt Clare offer a replay to Waterford after the ref blew it up three minutes early? Waterford took them up on it and lost again. The point is sport is about more than winning at all costs, it shouldnt be a bad example to youngsters who follow it, and there is a precedent for offering a replay. Btw, fair play to Sludden for not giving evidence and I think the judge should have honoured his decision

    Reply
  • Having seen the video footage I must say that it’s by far the most moronic way of “attacking” someone. They deserve to be punished but should also receive a subsequent sentence for carrying out the attack in an utter wussy-fied manner.

    Reply

Add New Comment