ON THE FIRST day at Aintree, officials have confirmed that Battlefront was a fatality during the John Smith’s Fox Hunters’ Chase earlier.
The race, over two miles and five furlongs of the National course, was won by 100-1 shot Tartan Snow.
Advertisement
Battlefront, an 11-year-old trained by well-known RTÉ and Channel 4 pundit Ted Walsh and ridden by his daughter, Katie, pulled up at the 11th fence.
“We are sad to confirm that Battlefront was pulled up at fence 11 by his jockey Katie Walsh and sadly shortly afterwards he collapsed and died,” Professor Chris Proudman, Aintree racecourse veterinary advisor said.
John Baker, regional director for Jockey Club Racecourses, added: “I would like to extend our sympathies to the Walsh family following this sad news.”
Katie Walsh again teams up with her father on Saturday when Seabass goes in the National.
Complete bollox above. These horses are treated extremely well, they are for the most part loved by their owners and they the are bred to be raced. This horse obviously had some condition, it didn’t die from trauma. If you want to get on your high horse (unintentional one there) then do it in the slums of limerick or ballymun where horses really are treated like shit. A horse could just be trotting around an it’s leg might break and it would have to be out down. Every sport has the ability to ‘gratify gamblers’. Don’t knock what you can’t understand
Sure Glen! Do you reckon the owners would love the horses as much if they were unable to race and of no stud value. They are bred to race, win and are loved while these conditions are met.
Your generalisations re: slums are hardly a surprise to me considering the media stable you hail from. The polarised reporting of the Mail has rubbed off on you.
Look I’m sorry for naming limerick and the mun. I genuinely meant no offence and should not have used the S word. I actually really like both areas, but there is a massive amount of mistreated horses there and in plenty of towns around the country. cathal, you proved yourself a hypocrite by ‘polarising’ your opinion on a very popular newspaper. Foolish comment
The views above, with respect, is pure bollock. The ISPCA/ RSPCA both approve of the sport and actually work continuously with race courses to make them safer for both horse and jockey. At Aintree Fences have been lowered, landing sides of fences have been made safer and RSPCA inspectors are in attendance for all three days of the National, the Aintree authorities have taken significant steps to remodel the course and make it as safe as possible for the horses. As have other courses around in both England and Ireland. Narrow minded protestors forget that horses were born to race and the care and attention given to the average racehorse is beyond comparison
The idea that racing people, who adore horses, would put them through something that they believe to be cruel is clearly complete nonsense. And anybody who suggests that horses are “forced” to do something they don’t enjoy has clearly never seen the reaction of a thoroughbred who doesn’t want to do something.
The handful of animal rights extremists, who seem determined to wreck the pleasures of ordinary folk, should redirect their attention to real, rather than imagined, animal cruelty
You say ACTUALLY like people don’t know or would be surprised that the ISPCA/ RSPCA work with the racing bodies in Ireland and the UK. Everyone is fully aware of what their function is. They are hardly just gonna walk away and “leave them at it”.
Also ask yourself why the Aintree fences have been lowered and landing sides of fences have been made safer. Maybe they were deemed..wait for it…too dangerous? and just maybe in another 50 years times they will have been made safer still because…wait for it…
Also a better word to use would be bred. Horses where not BORN to race. There were BRED to race. And your right, the attention given to the average racehorse is beyond comparison. Much like the attention given to the average Porsche. I mean why wouldn’t you take care of something that cost you so much money to buy and train and that has the potential to earn you money and glory?
If anything making the fences smaller makes them more dangerous as horses go quicker and take more chances. But it was something that the RSPCA demanded. Anyone who thinks the RSPCA is in the pockets of racing just shows their ignorance.
If you go through the record books there’s no correlation between number of runners to number of fallers or fatalities. You have to go back to 1882 to find a tiny field of 12 runners with 1 fatality, yet in the 1960s there were a number of runnings with 65+ runners and no fatalities. There have been multiple runnings with 40 runners and no problems.
“If anything making the fences smaller makes them more dangerous as horses go quicker and take more chances. But it was something that the RSPCA demanded. ” So you know more than the RSPCA when it comes to improving the safety of horses at Aintree? In fact in your “opinion” the RSPCA are putting the horses in more danger.
The horse didn’t fall. He was pulled up and had a heart attack. Could have happened while he was cantering at stud but it just so happened it died at Aintree. Wouldn’t have got the same reaction if it had died at stud!
Are horses programmed for this type of rich mans sport? I think not. There are levels and then some. Pushing a horse to its limits for gamblers gratification simply isn’t on.
rich man’s sport? – no more so than football. the rich man own the club/horse. the punters are the man in the street who likes to put a few bob on with the bookie.
Some of ye really have no idea about horse racing. These animals are treated better than most people, very very few people involved in the Irish horse industry would permit cruelty never mind engage in it. Many people in rural areas of Ireland, people of every income have horses, it’s not a rich man’s sport in Ireland & saying it is is ignorant.
Wild horses run all the time. It’s in a horses nature. Is that enlightenment enough for you? I’m 100% sure you’ve never ridden a horse in your life with such a mis-informed comment.
No, but they are very fit animals that gallop and jump when they’re loose in a field too, look at when the jockeys fall off, if the horses didn’t like it they’d just stop running
Never heard such utter tripe. My family part owns 2 racehorses and we are certainly not part of what was called in a previous comment this “rich mans sport”. We don’t do it for “betting gratification” either! We do it because we love the sport of horse racing and love horses. Both our mares absolutely love running on track and are extremely well looked after. More horses have died this year in Ireland due to malnourishment and neglect then have ever died on track! Re direct your anger at neglectful owners and don’t be so narrow sighted in your views of the horse racing community!
I do think that while the horses enjoy the fast racing and jumping and are trained for such; to see them being pushed to the limits by a jockey at times is cruel and is never nice to see a animal of any kind harmed especially die in such circumstances.
And how many horses have ran this year? While the death of any horse is regrettable, the 27 horse’s that have died are a very small percentage of the number of horse’s that have ran on the flat or over jumps this year.
The horse dropped dead. Before it died it was pulled up. It didnt die jumping a fence or flogged unmercifully. It was gonna happen no matter what that horse did today. For example that horse could have been in a field today galloping on its own no rider and dropped dead. Some people on here haven’t a f*cking notion what they’re talking about. As the lads said these horses are bread to race. They are treated like trainers own kids. I’ve seen horse cruelty up close and horse racing is so far away from that level of sh*t its not funny. How about all the people who drop dead on sports fields in this country ? Do we blame trainers and coaches ? No because it happens. It happened to my cousin. Its sad and anyone who has lost a loved one I apologise but anyone kidding themselves about how cruel horse racing is , well your talking through your hole.
I’m part of a syndicate and you can rest assured our horses are treated very well, and I’m shit sick of you people coming on here and talking shite about something you know SFA about.
You lot don’t know what it feels like to. Lose a horse ….do you ?
The jockey takes exactly the same risk as the horses you anti everything moanbags .JT McNamara now paralysed from doing a job he loved, Racehorses love the thrill of it too, that’s what there bred for, if there was no racing they wouldn’t even exsist. There treated very well and fed the best feed and all is asked of them is to runs a few races every year. Not a bad life at all IMO . Go moan at the travellers on hundreds of roads over Ireland beating the crap out of baby horses pulling sulky traps,that’s what you call cruelty to horses.
Cop on with all the ridiculous comments. I wouldn’t know even how to make out some of the bets in a bookmakers but i do know this an an intelligent person. No horse is pushed to its limit. There is a rule in racing that only permits a jockey to ‘strike or whip’ his or her horse just a limited number of times to prevent the cruelty side of the sport. And honestly how many of you criticising would ever turn down a free drink or a few €uro’s winning from a winner. Answer. None.
horse are pushedto the limit – juts like athlethes – and this may damage tem . But in genral they are well treated IMO – better than many humans .
But again I think that when a horse goes down – the are ” put down ” too quick . One hears of them being put down becaue of a broken leg etc . Well if they are to be raced – they should be as well treated as the jockeys – and not be put down becuse they are of no more commercail value . They have served their mentors well – and should get the best of treatment .
wish all Humans got the best of treatment .
the jockeys aslo take massive risks – especially in National Hunt – and there have been many tragedies as we all know .
These horses have better lives than most humans! The horse had a heart attack and died, it happens in every walk of life! If a fit 21 year old man has a heart attack and dies on a football pitch should that sport be banned?! In other words the tree huggers can shut the f¥*k up!
I hope all the people saying that its barbaric didn’t tuck into a nice meaty dinner tonight. Afterall, those little piggy’s and moo moo’s just thought they were going for a little spin. Surely these people wouldn’t have double standards??
What about the lorry driver? He knew where he was taking them…. Ban lorry driving too because thats barbaric. He should have taken them to the beach for a picnic instead
Lest we all suffer collective amnesia regarding the treatment of large quadrupeds around the globe, I’d like to ask all the vegetarians(if you are not one then you are a hypocrite regardless of how you have dressed it up for yourself) on here complaining about how the poor auld horses are treated if would they prefer if we treated them like cows? Because that is the only realistic alternative to keeping them as pets. Perhaps we should let these beautiful creatures roam free to frolic and dandy! I’m sure the horses would rather be sheep our perhaps pulling a plough.
It should be pointed out that many of these horses weigh in excess of 700 kg. no jockey weighs more than 65 kg. that is less than 10% of the horses weight, give me 10% of my weight and ask me to run around for 5 mins, no bother!! The weight does not affect the horses at all! They’re remarkably strong animals…
There you are!
What waffle! Would you like to be saddled with a weight and then told run full tilt around a hazardous course that could potentially be fatal to you? I sincerely doubt it. And you certainly wouldn’t do it just so you can be treated humanely by your owner. These owners by the way are in it for the money and the lifestyle, simple as. The trainer may develop a feeling for the animal, perhaps, but the owner sees it as a straight-up investment, it’s that simple.
If they were bred for it then why so many falls, injuries and deaths? They clearly aren’t bred for this level of activity, highlighted by their inability to perform the task being asked of them without fail. Dogs have been bred for centuries to perform certain tasks and they, without fail, perform those tasks due to the tasks being within the animal limitations. Hurdling fences at such speed clearly is not within all horses limitations and therefore they sadly get found out.
The horse has no choice here. When you say that any sport can gratify gambling, the competitor is in the sport of his/her own free will. They aren’t thrust into it just because they are bred for it.
You clearly are a gambler/owner and will not be swayed on this topic as it supplies you with endless great craic and something to do or talk about with your mates. All I’d say is look at this without the rose-tint, think of the horse in all this and you may see things a bit differently. Won’t someone please think of the horses!! :)
I know Animal Aid are ignorant of horseracing and after reading that if you aren’t a member already you should join up. The race today was a Hunter’s Chase, the horses running in it are mainly pets, often owned, trained and ridden by members of the same family. The riders get no fee and even the prize to the winning owner is the lowest of any on the card. Apart from the odd mare, the runners are overwhelmingly geldings with zero investment value. The Hunter Chases they usually run in have very weak markets so they will never get rich gambling on them, but that is not the reason for owning and spending a fortune looking after them. They do it because they love horses and the sport, two things the antis don’t. How much do Animal Aid invest in animal welfare, not much, if anything. All their time and effort goes on campaigning against racing or against cancer research (another of their favourite causes). They are the only group I know who are disappointed when no horses are killed as it stops them getting the publicity they crave. Why aren’t they campaigning about people riding on roads – about 3000! horses are killed in the UK each year in road traffic accidents. I put my money where my mouth is and am a paid up member of World Horse Welfare which actually works to help horses worldwide (and support the National ), racing spends millions on research into horse health which helps non-sports horses too and most racing people are quick to help when horses are in trouble.
To Danny.
Please listen up because I’m only going to say this once as I really don’t care what you think of our great sport/industry. Horse racing is a sport which is dangerous to both horses and jockeys alike. There is a lot of money to be made from racing a successful horse. These horses cost hundreds of thousands to buy and then you start with veterinary and training costs. Everyone involved holds the safety of the horses in utmost regard. I could tell you this is because we love them and some other cobblers but really it’s because it is a massive financial loss to lose a horse. Horses are bred to race. There are thousands of horses in training all over the country if racing was to stop tomorrow what would we do with them?. Also what would you do with the estimated 12000 new foals that will be registered this year?. These horses are athletes not pets. The horse knows nothing but racing. Through decades of selective breeding we have fine tuned the racehorse into a racing athlete. You must also remember that horses are animals. Same as cows sheep pigs. Do you object to them being raised to be killed. What about chickens raised intensively who never see the light of day?. We cannot
Get away from the fact that horses are raced for sport and money but they are at the end of the day animals. One final point Do you object to the arctic explorers who brought pack dogs with them to pull the sledges an then one by one killed the dogs to feed themselves and the rest of the pack?.
How about you answer the questions yourself…Do you object to the arctic explorers who brought pack dogs with them to pull the sledges an then one by one killed the dogs to feed themselves and the rest of the pack?
No, because they are animals. A means to an end. The fact is that humans are the dominant species on the planet, are able to train and control other species for their own gain. Or would you have it another way?
A common argument here, in fact it seems to be the only argument, of the pro-horse racing people is that the horses “get treated better than most people.” That may be the case but the fact remains there is a substantial risk that the horse will not return alive after a race. Now how many people here are “treated well” at home yet fear going into work for the risk of death? Exactly, no one
There is a substantial risk everyday when i go to work in my car to go look after racehorses that i might crash and die. There is a bigger risk which i fear most that my 2 little dogs who come to work with me in my car get killed if i am involved in an accident. I love them with all that i have and that fear is in me everytime a car tailgates me or i take a bend too quick. I love them but i take the risk. Same as me and everyone who care for horses 11 hours a day 7 days a week for less than minimum wage take a risk and run horses in races. If u dont know the care and love bestowed on racehorse then u have no right to judge us. (When u point ur finger at someone there are always 3 pointing back at u)
Why, are you drunk driving to work? I’ve driven to work for over forty years. I’m not frightened even though there is a theoretical risk of death. That’s a pretty thin argument Niamh.
Niamh, you take these “risks” with your own informed consent and intention, yes? Now, these horses are not designed to race, it’s not instinctive, and they certainly wouldn’t sign up for something which had a realistic chance of death if they could . That is a fact, and it is the key factor which cancels out your argument.
How substantial Andrew. Let me do some rough figures for you. On average 1 race meeting in Ireland and 4 in England per day. 7 races per card. Lets be conservative and say 15 horses per race. We are 90 days into the year. So 5x7x15x90 = 47250 horses raced this calendar year. Using the figure from a previous comment of 27 fatalities this year. Gives .057% chance of a horse not coming back. .057% not very substantial. A lot of people seem to think horse racing only exists during aintree and cheltenham.
John Sheridan, you are the man!! Too many people here haven’t a clue about horse racing or any of the equine industries. Let me break it to some of you, horses are made to run, their whole physiology is designed to run, but then only people with real knowledge of horses know how much they can love to run, and race, and jump.
There are many many retraining centres across the country, the racing school takes horses to teach young jockeys, trainers favourites are retired to pasture, mares are retired to stud and many individuals take them in as riding horses.
I imagine his wife and kids see it that way too. Whats 30 or 40 years of being paralysed from the neck down compared to 27 dead horses. Good comment man yeah.
Niamh is typical of the wonderful people who are the lifeblood of racing. Committed, talented and energetic , they could make a better living doing something else yet choose “the horses” out of love for the sport. Long may they prosper.
There is only one alternative to horses as a form of entertainment, that is as a source of food. Anyone who believes anything differently is naive and had no idea of how expensive it is to keep/own a horse. Down with racing, up with abattoirs!
Leinster smash past Harlequins with 10-try rout at Croke Park
9 mins ago
6
FreeWrap
€32 million striker ends barren run as West Ham battle to earn point
12 mins ago
0
FreeAs it happened
Leinster v Harlequins, Champions Cup Round of 16
2 hrs ago
64
Sign in or create a free account
To continue reading create a free account
Or sign into an existing account
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 164 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.Privacy Policy
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 111 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 146 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 116 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 85 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 85 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 136 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 76 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 84 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 47 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 93 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 100 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 73 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 55 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 91 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
Complete bollox above. These horses are treated extremely well, they are for the most part loved by their owners and they the are bred to be raced. This horse obviously had some condition, it didn’t die from trauma. If you want to get on your high horse (unintentional one there) then do it in the slums of limerick or ballymun where horses really are treated like shit. A horse could just be trotting around an it’s leg might break and it would have to be out down. Every sport has the ability to ‘gratify gamblers’. Don’t knock what you can’t understand
I gave you a thumbs up til you called my hometown Ballymun a slum..how are things in your ivory tower pal? Nice is it?
I love horses, especially those manufactured for and behalf of Tesco.
Can’t understand?
This is my response to that entire comment – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkodTydUR0E
This clip is a pretty good description of horse racing too – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ls73u3SckF4
The slums of limerick…Up there with mumbai and rio….truth!
Except for the weather
@Conor. Go find you’re Galway girl or guy you Mundy wannabe.
Sure Glen! Do you reckon the owners would love the horses as much if they were unable to race and of no stud value. They are bred to race, win and are loved while these conditions are met.
Your generalisations re: slums are hardly a surprise to me considering the media stable you hail from. The polarised reporting of the Mail has rubbed off on you.
I already found her casper!!
Showing your ignorance there Cathal, all the male horses in the Grand National are geldings (look it up) so therefore have zero stud value.
????
” If you want to get on your high horse then do it in the slums of limerick or ballymun where horses really are treated like shit”
What about ballybane, rahoon, tuam, coolock, tallaght, jobstown, cherry orchard, ballyfermot, blancharstown, clonsilla, lisduggan, knocknaheeny, mayfield, togher, holyhill, grunabraher, bishopstown, wilton, swords, finglas, finglas west, finglas east, finglas south, finglas north, glasnevin.
Why do people like you always pick on ballymun…….
Glen, was there a need for u to go naming Limerick and Ballymun in your rant? Have a little think in future! Foolish comment.
Monksfield , an entire horse, won the Champion Hurdle.
Conor, you haven’t seen ballybane, rahoon, tuam, coolock, tallaght, jobstown, cherry orchard, ballyfermot, blancharstown, clonsilla, lisduggan, knocknaheeny, mayfield, togher, holyhill, grunabraher, bishopstown, wilton, swords, finglas, finglas west, finglas east, finglas south, finglas north, glasnevin.
All of Limerick’s “slums” would fit into knocknaheey or coolock.
Look I’m sorry for naming limerick and the mun. I genuinely meant no offence and should not have used the S word. I actually really like both areas, but there is a massive amount of mistreated horses there and in plenty of towns around the country. cathal, you proved yourself a hypocrite by ‘polarising’ your opinion on a very popular newspaper. Foolish comment
The views above, with respect, is pure bollock. The ISPCA/ RSPCA both approve of the sport and actually work continuously with race courses to make them safer for both horse and jockey. At Aintree Fences have been lowered, landing sides of fences have been made safer and RSPCA inspectors are in attendance for all three days of the National, the Aintree authorities have taken significant steps to remodel the course and make it as safe as possible for the horses. As have other courses around in both England and Ireland. Narrow minded protestors forget that horses were born to race and the care and attention given to the average racehorse is beyond comparison
The idea that racing people, who adore horses, would put them through something that they believe to be cruel is clearly complete nonsense. And anybody who suggests that horses are “forced” to do something they don’t enjoy has clearly never seen the reaction of a thoroughbred who doesn’t want to do something.
The handful of animal rights extremists, who seem determined to wreck the pleasures of ordinary folk, should redirect their attention to real, rather than imagined, animal cruelty
You say ACTUALLY like people don’t know or would be surprised that the ISPCA/ RSPCA work with the racing bodies in Ireland and the UK. Everyone is fully aware of what their function is. They are hardly just gonna walk away and “leave them at it”.
Also ask yourself why the Aintree fences have been lowered and landing sides of fences have been made safer. Maybe they were deemed..wait for it…too dangerous? and just maybe in another 50 years times they will have been made safer still because…wait for it…
Well said Colin, couldn’t agree more
Also a better word to use would be bred. Horses where not BORN to race. There were BRED to race. And your right, the attention given to the average racehorse is beyond comparison. Much like the attention given to the average Porsche. I mean why wouldn’t you take care of something that cost you so much money to buy and train and that has the potential to earn you money and glory?
the problem isn’t with the height of the fences etc etc, its due to the shear no of horses running esp in the grand national, 40 or so last count
If anything making the fences smaller makes them more dangerous as horses go quicker and take more chances. But it was something that the RSPCA demanded. Anyone who thinks the RSPCA is in the pockets of racing just shows their ignorance.
If you go through the record books there’s no correlation between number of runners to number of fallers or fatalities. You have to go back to 1882 to find a tiny field of 12 runners with 1 fatality, yet in the 1960s there were a number of runnings with 65+ runners and no fatalities. There have been multiple runnings with 40 runners and no problems.
Shhh Richard! You’re making too much sense!
Screw you, people ate entitled to their opinions. Who are you to say bollocks to anyone.
“If anything making the fences smaller makes them more dangerous as horses go quicker and take more chances. But it was something that the RSPCA demanded. ” So you know more than the RSPCA when it comes to improving the safety of horses at Aintree? In fact in your “opinion” the RSPCA are putting the horses in more danger.
The horse didn’t fall. He was pulled up and had a heart attack. Could have happened while he was cantering at stud but it just so happened it died at Aintree. Wouldn’t have got the same reaction if it had died at stud!
Are horses programmed for this type of rich mans sport? I think not. There are levels and then some. Pushing a horse to its limits for gamblers gratification simply isn’t on.
I agree it’s a disgraceful “sport” where animals needlessly die for others gratification.
rich man’s sport? – no more so than football. the rich man own the club/horse. the punters are the man in the street who likes to put a few bob on with the bookie.
Some of ye really have no idea about horse racing. These animals are treated better than most people, very very few people involved in the Irish horse industry would permit cruelty never mind engage in it. Many people in rural areas of Ireland, people of every income have horses, it’s not a rich man’s sport in Ireland & saying it is is ignorant.
In these hard times, anyone that can afford to gamble is rich.
The horse dropped dead lads. Get a grip.
Oh so the horses volunteer for grueling training regimes Thomas do they? Sorry and thanks for enlightening us.
Wild horses run all the time. It’s in a horses nature. Is that enlightenment enough for you? I’m 100% sure you’ve never ridden a horse in your life with such a mis-informed comment.
No, but they are very fit animals that gallop and jump when they’re loose in a field too, look at when the jockeys fall off, if the horses didn’t like it they’d just stop running
McCoy didnt say to Synchronised last year after he fell “you go on without me”! No the horse did it of his own accord!
It’s no more gruelling than you or I going to the beach. These horses are athletes in peak physical condition
They run when they’re afraid of something. When the danger has passed they stop. Some of you horse experts are not so expert.
Really? Are you a horse whisperer or something?
Read all his comments. He obviously hasnt a notion.
Never heard such utter tripe. My family part owns 2 racehorses and we are certainly not part of what was called in a previous comment this “rich mans sport”. We don’t do it for “betting gratification” either! We do it because we love the sport of horse racing and love horses. Both our mares absolutely love running on track and are extremely well looked after. More horses have died this year in Ireland due to malnourishment and neglect then have ever died on track! Re direct your anger at neglectful owners and don’t be so narrow sighted in your views of the horse racing community!
We are not only rich but also of the boastful type aren’t we Gertrude?
Can’t see how I was boasting at all there?
I do think that while the horses enjoy the fast racing and jumping and are trained for such; to see them being pushed to the limits by a jockey at times is cruel and is never nice to see a animal of any kind harmed especially die in such circumstances.
Battlefront was the 27th horse to die this year in UK/IRE racing.
And how many horses have ran this year? While the death of any horse is regrettable, the 27 horse’s that have died are a very small percentage of the number of horse’s that have ran on the flat or over jumps this year.
totally irrelevant point, fact is that 27 horses un-needfully died because of human interference.
The horse dropped dead. Before it died it was pulled up. It didnt die jumping a fence or flogged unmercifully. It was gonna happen no matter what that horse did today. For example that horse could have been in a field today galloping on its own no rider and dropped dead. Some people on here haven’t a f*cking notion what they’re talking about. As the lads said these horses are bread to race. They are treated like trainers own kids. I’ve seen horse cruelty up close and horse racing is so far away from that level of sh*t its not funny. How about all the people who drop dead on sports fields in this country ? Do we blame trainers and coaches ? No because it happens. It happened to my cousin. Its sad and anyone who has lost a loved one I apologise but anyone kidding themselves about how cruel horse racing is , well your talking through your hole.
Well said John!
That’s bullshit
Sorry to hear about you cousin lad and very eloquently put some people on here dint know their arse from their elbow
The comment was in reply to Pat Murphy
100/1 … Get in you beauty!
The funniest comment of the day! Great!
Rode to death… I could think of worse ways of going…
Barbaric ”sport.” Cue the avalanche of red thumbs from the gamblers.
I’m part of a syndicate and you can rest assured our horses are treated very well, and I’m shit sick of you people coming on here and talking shite about something you know SFA about.
You lot don’t know what it feels like to. Lose a horse ….do you ?
The jockey takes exactly the same risk as the horses you anti everything moanbags .JT McNamara now paralysed from doing a job he loved, Racehorses love the thrill of it too, that’s what there bred for, if there was no racing they wouldn’t even exsist. There treated very well and fed the best feed and all is asked of them is to runs a few races every year. Not a bad life at all IMO . Go moan at the travellers on hundreds of roads over Ireland beating the crap out of baby horses pulling sulky traps,that’s what you call cruelty to horses.
Horses are more likeable than humans..
Jockeys have a choice.horses don’t
Chris, chris chris! You obviously never saw a horse refuse to do something then ;) if they don’t want to do something they won’t.
lucy, do many racehorses choose not to race?
Horses refuse to leave the start line sometimes. I think thats the horse making a choice ;)
i think your right, that is a horse making a choice..but what i mean is do some racehorses just go ” naw i don’t fancy this at all as a life”…
I wouldn’t think so Chris because they can’t speak but if they did they would say ‘yeehaw look at me go’.
I meant to say Alex, i do apologise.
Cop on with all the ridiculous comments. I wouldn’t know even how to make out some of the bets in a bookmakers but i do know this an an intelligent person. No horse is pushed to its limit. There is a rule in racing that only permits a jockey to ‘strike or whip’ his or her horse just a limited number of times to prevent the cruelty side of the sport. And honestly how many of you criticising would ever turn down a free drink or a few €uro’s winning from a winner. Answer. None.
horse are pushedto the limit – juts like athlethes – and this may damage tem . But in genral they are well treated IMO – better than many humans .
But again I think that when a horse goes down – the are ” put down ” too quick . One hears of them being put down becaue of a broken leg etc . Well if they are to be raced – they should be as well treated as the jockeys – and not be put down becuse they are of no more commercail value . They have served their mentors well – and should get the best of treatment .
wish all Humans got the best of treatment .
the jockeys aslo take massive risks – especially in National Hunt – and there have been many tragedies as we all know .
These horses have better lives than most humans! The horse had a heart attack and died, it happens in every walk of life! If a fit 21 year old man has a heart attack and dies on a football pitch should that sport be banned?! In other words the tree huggers can shut the f¥*k up!
did that fit 21yr old have a saddle on him and have the be-jaysus whipped out of him?
I think not.
Ever gone Pre season training?
Uv obviously not picked up a whip lately. Padded beyond being any use so they are. Just noisy.
Getting a bit hysterical there nor. What’s the matter? Afraid someone might interfere with your gambling?
My gambling is my business, but I’m willing to bet that you don’t actually have a clue what you’re talking about!
I hope all the people saying that its barbaric didn’t tuck into a nice meaty dinner tonight. Afterall, those little piggy’s and moo moo’s just thought they were going for a little spin. Surely these people wouldn’t have double standards??
If you don’t like it don’t watch it.
And they were raised with the explicit intention of killing them…. Barbaric farmers … Ban farming!!!
What about the lorry driver? He knew where he was taking them…. Ban lorry driving too because thats barbaric. He should have taken them to the beach for a picnic instead
PETA are out in full force today.
Why are the pro-horse torture/red-thumbers hiding behind the icon pushing? What’s your argument for this inhumane act of “sport”?
Horse torture? Get real. What are your arguments against it? These horses are treated extremely well and a lot better than most other animals.
Lest we all suffer collective amnesia regarding the treatment of large quadrupeds around the globe, I’d like to ask all the vegetarians(if you are not one then you are a hypocrite regardless of how you have dressed it up for yourself) on here complaining about how the poor auld horses are treated if would they prefer if we treated them like cows? Because that is the only realistic alternative to keeping them as pets. Perhaps we should let these beautiful creatures roam free to frolic and dandy! I’m sure the horses would rather be sheep our perhaps pulling a plough.
It should be pointed out that many of these horses weigh in excess of 700 kg. no jockey weighs more than 65 kg. that is less than 10% of the horses weight, give me 10% of my weight and ask me to run around for 5 mins, no bother!! The weight does not affect the horses at all! They’re remarkably strong animals…
There you are!
What waffle! Would you like to be saddled with a weight and then told run full tilt around a hazardous course that could potentially be fatal to you? I sincerely doubt it. And you certainly wouldn’t do it just so you can be treated humanely by your owner. These owners by the way are in it for the money and the lifestyle, simple as. The trainer may develop a feeling for the animal, perhaps, but the owner sees it as a straight-up investment, it’s that simple.
If they were bred for it then why so many falls, injuries and deaths? They clearly aren’t bred for this level of activity, highlighted by their inability to perform the task being asked of them without fail. Dogs have been bred for centuries to perform certain tasks and they, without fail, perform those tasks due to the tasks being within the animal limitations. Hurdling fences at such speed clearly is not within all horses limitations and therefore they sadly get found out.
The horse has no choice here. When you say that any sport can gratify gambling, the competitor is in the sport of his/her own free will. They aren’t thrust into it just because they are bred for it.
You clearly are a gambler/owner and will not be swayed on this topic as it supplies you with endless great craic and something to do or talk about with your mates. All I’d say is look at this without the rose-tint, think of the horse in all this and you may see things a bit differently. Won’t someone please think of the horses!! :)
Your ignorance of the industry is outstanding. Serious achievement.
lets put a saddle on you and create a new industry!!! ha,ha!!!
I know Animal Aid are ignorant of horseracing and after reading that if you aren’t a member already you should join up. The race today was a Hunter’s Chase, the horses running in it are mainly pets, often owned, trained and ridden by members of the same family. The riders get no fee and even the prize to the winning owner is the lowest of any on the card. Apart from the odd mare, the runners are overwhelmingly geldings with zero investment value. The Hunter Chases they usually run in have very weak markets so they will never get rich gambling on them, but that is not the reason for owning and spending a fortune looking after them. They do it because they love horses and the sport, two things the antis don’t. How much do Animal Aid invest in animal welfare, not much, if anything. All their time and effort goes on campaigning against racing or against cancer research (another of their favourite causes). They are the only group I know who are disappointed when no horses are killed as it stops them getting the publicity they crave. Why aren’t they campaigning about people riding on roads – about 3000! horses are killed in the UK each year in road traffic accidents. I put my money where my mouth is and am a paid up member of World Horse Welfare which actually works to help horses worldwide (and support the National ), racing spends millions on research into horse health which helps non-sports horses too and most racing people are quick to help when horses are in trouble.
To Danny.
Please listen up because I’m only going to say this once as I really don’t care what you think of our great sport/industry. Horse racing is a sport which is dangerous to both horses and jockeys alike. There is a lot of money to be made from racing a successful horse. These horses cost hundreds of thousands to buy and then you start with veterinary and training costs. Everyone involved holds the safety of the horses in utmost regard. I could tell you this is because we love them and some other cobblers but really it’s because it is a massive financial loss to lose a horse. Horses are bred to race. There are thousands of horses in training all over the country if racing was to stop tomorrow what would we do with them?. Also what would you do with the estimated 12000 new foals that will be registered this year?. These horses are athletes not pets. The horse knows nothing but racing. Through decades of selective breeding we have fine tuned the racehorse into a racing athlete. You must also remember that horses are animals. Same as cows sheep pigs. Do you object to them being raised to be killed. What about chickens raised intensively who never see the light of day?. We cannot
Get away from the fact that horses are raced for sport and money but they are at the end of the day animals. One final point Do you object to the arctic explorers who brought pack dogs with them to pull the sledges an then one by one killed the dogs to feed themselves and the rest of the pack?.
How about you answer the questions yourself…Do you object to the arctic explorers who brought pack dogs with them to pull the sledges an then one by one killed the dogs to feed themselves and the rest of the pack?
No, because they are animals. A means to an end. The fact is that humans are the dominant species on the planet, are able to train and control other species for their own gain. Or would you have it another way?
well I wasn’t asking you…
Let me ask a simple question! Are some of ye here saying horse racing should be banned?
A common argument here, in fact it seems to be the only argument, of the pro-horse racing people is that the horses “get treated better than most people.” That may be the case but the fact remains there is a substantial risk that the horse will not return alive after a race. Now how many people here are “treated well” at home yet fear going into work for the risk of death? Exactly, no one
There is a substantial risk everyday when i go to work in my car to go look after racehorses that i might crash and die. There is a bigger risk which i fear most that my 2 little dogs who come to work with me in my car get killed if i am involved in an accident. I love them with all that i have and that fear is in me everytime a car tailgates me or i take a bend too quick. I love them but i take the risk. Same as me and everyone who care for horses 11 hours a day 7 days a week for less than minimum wage take a risk and run horses in races. If u dont know the care and love bestowed on racehorse then u have no right to judge us. (When u point ur finger at someone there are always 3 pointing back at u)
Why, are you drunk driving to work? I’ve driven to work for over forty years. I’m not frightened even though there is a theoretical risk of death. That’s a pretty thin argument Niamh.
Niamh, you take these “risks” with your own informed consent and intention, yes? Now, these horses are not designed to race, it’s not instinctive, and they certainly wouldn’t sign up for something which had a realistic chance of death if they could . That is a fact, and it is the key factor which cancels out your argument.
How substantial Andrew. Let me do some rough figures for you. On average 1 race meeting in Ireland and 4 in England per day. 7 races per card. Lets be conservative and say 15 horses per race. We are 90 days into the year. So 5x7x15x90 = 47250 horses raced this calendar year. Using the figure from a previous comment of 27 fatalities this year. Gives .057% chance of a horse not coming back. .057% not very substantial. A lot of people seem to think horse racing only exists during aintree and cheltenham.
John Sheridan, you are the man!! Too many people here haven’t a clue about horse racing or any of the equine industries. Let me break it to some of you, horses are made to run, their whole physiology is designed to run, but then only people with real knowledge of horses know how much they can love to run, and race, and jump.
Over 40 people dead on Irish roads since Jan 1st. Every journey is a risk.
I’ll try to remember that when one is running a bit keen with me in a bit of work!
Hates it when the pc brigade come to town with zero knowledge of the industry (except for what they have googled).
what happens to there horses when they finish their career? that’s when the cruelty seems to start for many of them !
Noo. Noo. You can be sure that the lovely Niamh Mangan nurses and minds them tenderly until they die of old age. Especially the geldings.
There are many many retraining centres across the country, the racing school takes horses to teach young jockeys, trainers favourites are retired to pasture, mares are retired to stud and many individuals take them in as riding horses.
and still the majority of them end up in tescos!
Off to Tesco with him!
27 horses dead this year nobody gives a fcuk i human is paralysed an everyone has an outpouring of grief?
I imagine his wife and kids see it that way too. Whats 30 or 40 years of being paralysed from the neck down compared to 27 dead horses. Good comment man yeah.
What a vulgar, crass comment! If you are looking for notice or seeking notoriety, there are less offensive ways! Cop on to yourself.
Niamh is typical of the wonderful people who are the lifeblood of racing. Committed, talented and energetic , they could make a better living doing something else yet choose “the horses” out of love for the sport. Long may they prosper.
Walsh is a knob
There is only one alternative to horses as a form of entertainment, that is as a source of food. Anyone who believes anything differently is naive and had no idea of how expensive it is to keep/own a horse. Down with racing, up with abattoirs!
Moderator
Please put posts in time order so replies and comments can reflect continuity