The Score uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Reporters incur wrath of Tour leader Wiggins over internet doping questions

“It’s easy for them to sit under a pseudonym on Twitter and write that, rather than get off their arses in their own lives and apply themselves,” he said.

Bradley Wiggins in yellow yesterday.
Bradley Wiggins in yellow yesterday.
Image: Christophe Ena/AP/Press Association Images

TOUR DE FRANCE leader Bradley Wiggins has unleashed a scathing attack on internet critics who implied his Team Sky had doped.

The Briton, known for his abrasive relationship with the media, took umbrage to a question asked regarding his team’s dominance of stage seven, shortly after retaining the leader’s yellow jersey at the end of stage eight.

The 32-year-old was less than impressed with comparisons between Wiggins’ Sky team to Lance Armstrong’s former United States Postal Service squad, which is now the subject of US Anti-Doping charges.

Directed at the media pack as well as anonymous Twitter users, the insinuation prompted an expletive-laden retort from Wiggins.

“I say they’re just f***ing w**kers, I cannot be doing with people like that,” said Wiggins, who holds a 10-second lead over defending champion Cadel Evans. ”It justifies their own bone-idleness because they can’t ever imagine applying themselves to do anything in their lives.

“It’s easy for them to sit under a pseudonym on Twitter and write that sort of shit, rather than get off their arses in their own lives and apply themselves and work hard at something and achieve something.

“And that’s ultimately it – c****,” he added.

Wiggins retains yellow jersey as Olympic road race champion crashes out of Tour de France

Read next:

Comments (14 Comments)

  • No, people are speculating because of the culture of doping that existed in cycling almost since the inception of the tour. Anybody with a knowlege of the history of the grand tours will know of widespread use of stimulants to advance endurance and performance. Doping programs existed long before US Postal/Armstrong.
    The missing link, of course, was the man himself, gifted with more charisma than you could shake a stick at. Never a fan, I joined the cycle round the Phoenix park with him a few years ago. It was simply an extraordinary thing to do-can you imagine Ronaldo or Messi organising a 5 a side on your local pitch? Armstrong is a public manipulator(imho)unlike anything seen before or since. His intimidation of the peleton was legendary, both physical and psychological. If you want to call this a witch hunt, then it was inevitable that the hunters would show more zeal than in other cases simply because Armstrong pissed so many people off, so mightily.
    Id rather see it as chickens coming home to roost.
    As far as SKY is concerned, the team isnt showing more than BMC, or LIQUIGAS, or to an extent LOTTO. Also, SKY have an amazing set up, with fantastic riders, better looked after than probably any other team in the pro peleton.
    Cycling in Ireland shouldve been someway towards this standard by now, given the strength of the sport here in the eighties, and the potential. Instead of a couple of velodromes being built for starters, which is what got British cycling where it is today, we got ghost estates and empty holiday homes funded by tax concessions for developers. It always pisses me off to visit small communities in Europe where sports facilities, roofed and outdoor, beggar what we have in large towns.
    End of rant.

    Reply
  • I like him.

    Reply
  • Well said John. Rant it was but enjoyable all the same.

    Reply
  • Legend! Love it when athletes speak their minds! I feel refreshed

    Reply
  • Too right !

    Reply
  • No bluster there. No evasive answers there. Hope that shuts ‘em up.

    Reply
  • Excellent rant John.

    Reply
  • He should of focused his anger at the US team who brought the sport into question. It is actually their fault people are speculating.

    Reply
  • I find it incredible that so many people hold this opinion of Lance Armstrong. The man is the most tested athlete of all time, has always openly engaged with the media and his fans and for the record, has never returned a test positive for doping.
    In his lifetime he has accomplished an incredible amount both on and off the bike and
    in my opinion, the world is a better place because of him. His Livestrong foundation does an amazing amount of work! I have in recent days been quite vocal about this topic and without repeating myself, I have posted the doping percentages within cycling V other endurance sports. What I find most disappointing is that Lance Armstrong’s name is brought up every time this topic is discussed. Hardly seems fair when he has proven more then anyone that his success on the bike was due to hard work and a determination that I only wish I had a percentage of.

    Reply
    • Have you read David Walsh’s book, ‘From Lance to Landis’? It gives a great view that isn’t the media friendly one pushed by Lance. He may have been the most tested athlete of all time, but EPO – the blood boosting drug that was in vogue around the time that he won his Tours de France – was undetectable by a drugs test at the time. EPO increased a person’s red bloodcell count (enabling more oxygen to be carried around the body) and all that cheats had to do was make sure that they were below a set blood cell count. To have passed drug tests means nothing if the drug is undetectable.

      EPO was a very commonly used performance enhancer during those years (and preceeding years, I might add) and many, many cyclists used it. Look at the list of his opponents that were banned during or shortly after this time. It seems incredible that somebody who is clean could win so consistently against people who were juiced up to their eyeballs. His argument that his performance increase against his pre-cancer form was due to losing weight (a couple of Kg) is dubious at best.

      Yes, Livestrong (.org, not the .com version) does an amazing job. That has nothing to do with the allegations of taking PEDs though.

      I would refer you again to David Walsh’s book as he forwards a much more convincing argument than can fit here. Read it and decide for yourself.

      Reply
    • I haven’t read that but certainly give it a go. My real issue is the fact that the man is presumed guilty within the media without clear concise evidence to back it up? I agree with you that it sounds dubious for someone to be clean and perform at that level but that does not entitle us to make unfounded allegations that could potentially ruin his character. I will give that book a go though. Cheers

      Reply

Add New Comment