He said racsit remarks and when he got caught by and INDEPENDENT COMMISON!!! he changed his tune, he is not a victim, evra barely is either, but he said something stupid he shouldnt have and club and player need to shut up and move on!!! I am a Liverpool fan and all this tunnel vison for the pool and suarez is stupid and childish, grow up, move on, if it was the other way around, you would all be laughing about it! We have an average manager in an average league and will finish in the top 10 no matter if Suarez plays every game or none at all,. He said a stupid thing and got punished, move the f**k on. Sick of this i hate man u stuff. Focus on ourselves, Liverpool sure dont handle situations the way the club did in the past…. A lot of fans need to engage perspective and grow up a bit.

How many people who have posted here have actually read the commission’s report? The summaries you’re getting through the media are inaccurate. If you want to form an informed opinion you should read it in full for yourself. There are inconsistencies in both player’s versions. Suarez claimed that at one point he was trying to defuse the situation – that is patent rubbish and seems to have turned the commission completely against him and destroyed his credibility (in their eyes) on everything else he said. Seems a very harsh approach to deem him completely unreliable for not admitting something comparatively innocuous and which does not really matter to the central accusation of specific words used (or not used). Evra had as many inconsistencies in his version. Evra claims that when Suarez said negro he understood – at that time- that the word equated to the much worse n word and that is why he was so shocked/upset/amazed at Suarez using it. Yet when, at the time, he complained to the ref, and to his captain Giggs, he said to them he had been called ‘black’ not the n word. Who, believing they had been called a n****r, and reeling from the (understandable) shock of hearing that, would go to the ref/giggs and say they’d been called “black”? Why would you sanitise it when the entire reason for the (understandable) outrage/shock would be the word itself? He said he couldn’t bring himself to say such a shocking word again. Come on. Doesn’t make any sense. Throughout the report Suarez’s inconsistencies (there are quite a few) were played up whilst Evra’s (there are as many) were played down or completely ignored. I am a Liverpool football fan but this has nothing to do with football. I don’t know the truth and nor does anyone else posting here. There is also the possibility that neither player is lying but genuinely believes what they heard. But my view, and I’m sure I’ll be accused of bias because of my football allegiance, is that Suarez has been treated very unfairly and very inconsistently as against the treatment of Evra. I would urge anyone who really cares to read the report and to read it slowly/carefully. On the inconsistency point the evidence is in the report for Evra to be found guilty of the exact same 2 charges that Suarez was found guilty of. Evra used foul and abusive language, and made a reference to Suarez’s ethnicity. And he did each prior to Suarez so a defence of simply reacting – which might have been fair enough had his remarks followed Suarez’s- does not apply. Yet no action has been taken against him at all. A couple of other points: (1) if LFC genuinely believe an injustice has been done then they are right to stick by Suarez and say it publicly. To do otherwise would be immoral. (2) saying the commission was independent, issued a considered report and had a QC on it, and using that to argue they can’t be disagreed with, is nonsense. They could have gotten it wrong. They could have attached too much weight to Suarez not admitting the conciliation point above. They are not infallible. They finished hearing evidence on a Friday and issued their verbal decision the following Tuesday. This is not something they deliberated over for months. Read the report if you care enough.

Don’t matter what colour Evra’s skin is to be honest. The biggest factor about him is the fact he is French. When France cheated Ireland out of a world cup place Evra said we deserve a replay……”but only on the playstation” hate the little prick.

Suarez is being made an example of. The most he should of received is a 2 or 4 game ban for what he said. I hope the FA are going to make a bigger example of John Terry when its his time for a ban. Oh wait he is the England and Chelsea captain so he probably wont get a ban ! Suarez doesnt even have a chance to appeal whether he is guilty or not, only for how long he gets banned for. What kind of a system is that?
He wasnt even found guilty or highly probably guilty, just probable on the evidence of a known lier who has made cases like this before and even Evra said in his testimony that he didnt think Suarez was a racist. Spanish linguistic experts have even said that what Evra says Suarez said makes no sense in Spanish let alone the Uragurian version of the language but that didnt matter. And what happened to Evra over insulting Suarez’s sister in Spanish? Nothing !