David Forde 7 - Wasn’t tested much in the first half but was once again commanding when called upon. Unsighted for the goal and taken off with 16 minutes to play.
Paul McShane5 - Shaky start and looked nervous with the ball at his feet throughout. Had a header just off target early on.
Sean St Ledger6 – Good block on David Villa to get his body in the way in the 19th minute and had the ball in the back of the net but it was ruled out for offside.
Darren O’Dea5 - Had been having a decent game but heavy touch gifted the ball to Arbeloa who flicked on for Soldado in the run-up to the goal and unable to get near Mata for second.
Advertisement
Stephen Kelly6 – The Reading defender did okay and headed the ball off the crossbar before Cox was called offside.
Jeff Hendrick5 – Couldn’t get near the Spanish midfield but sat behind the ball when he had to with McCarthy on his first senior start. Substituted at half-time.
James McCarthy 6 – Clearance off the line in first half. Quiet start but and didn’t have his best game in an Ireland shirt against admittedly first class opposition.
Seamus Coleman7 – His confidence was evidently high and ent by Jordi Alba with a drop of the shoulder 11 minutes in. Put in a good shift.
Andy Keogh6 – Decent delivery for the corner which McShane headed over and worked hard before being subbed for McClean.
Robbie Keane4 – After five goals in his last two games, the skipper was anonymous in the first half and got taken off after 57 minutes.
Conor Sammon5- Unable to use his physical presence to win many headers. Stole the ball from Pique for Ireland’s best chance of the first half but his finish was poor. Did nutmeg Jordi Alba though.
Substitutes
Stephen Quinn 6 - Got in Spanish faces and looked composed when he was given the chance on the ball.
Simon Cox5 – Unable to make an impact and caught Busquets to earn a yellow. Also caught in an offside position for Ireland’s disallowed goal.
James McClean5 – Was prevented a goal by Iker Casillas’ super save.
Darren Randolph6 – Good save from Cazorla after coming on as a late substitute. Couldn’t stop Mata, however.
Just think of the players the country would produce if even just a quarter of the money pumped into GAA was put into soccer instead.
Couldn’t care less if Spain are the best team in the world, that was an absolute shocking game from Ireland yet again, horrible football. Most of our players are utterly dreadful.
Yes but remember which game is the professional one….. Should be self sufficient. Maybe if delaney the donkey and co took a pay cut and led by example it might be a step in the right direction.
Delaney and Co., are very well paid for a small Country and compare it to the Spanish FA boss? The problem is within, look there instead and demand action there!
@paul, no traction? Are you kidding me football is the most played sport on the island followed way down the line by gaelic football and then hurling with less than half of what football numbers achieve
What money is “pumped” into the GAA? Do you mean the way GAA clubs apply for and receive sports capital grants? Are you aware that these grants are open to and available for all sports clubs who get their act together to apply for them?
Spain has a population of 50 million and is soccer/football crazy. No amount of investment is going to swing that. Especially not when the best young Irish players get snapped up and coached in England.
Ok, so the the problem lies solely with Delaney not the barstoolers who stay at home and leave loi stadiums empty every friday, so we get rid of Delaney save 400k on his salary and then what??? We magically become a small, efficient football powerhouse like Croatia??…
No personally I think it’s going to take a little more than that, though I don’t doubt the FAI are a bunch of bandits, the interest and appetitive for domestic football just isn’t there in this country!
People prefer to spend their money on the gaa and the rugby, fair enough I say, but that being the case, lets not get all bitter and pretend we’re a football nation.
True Colm, but those stats are misleading because all those kids playing football give it up at 18 or switch to Gaelic, unless an English club signs them, there is a massive talent drain because tv LOI is neither amateur nor a lucrative professional league, it makes no financial sense to keep playing so they all quit at 18 and we lose out on all those potential stars.
If the fai wasn’t full of idiots that might happen. The Gaa pays mostly for itself as does the ifru. They have common sense something the failure has none of. Look at kidney, he failed to develop the younger players and lost winnable games and he got sacked. Trap won’t even play some of our best players and he’s still there. Look at the aviva stadium. The irfu nearly has its half played off, the fai has only like 20% paid off (I forget the exact figure it was in the prime time documentary) and yet Delaney is paid more than his English Spanish and Italian counterparts combined. This has nothing to do with gaa favourtism, which will always be the most popular sport in Ireland regardless of public expenditure, and everything to do with the incompetence of the fai.
Its refreshing reading these positive comments about the LOI and how we can improve it rather than the usual BS drama from the EPL “is Jose coming back, is he, isn’t he”
The F.A.I-lures need to pull their head outta the sand, Delaney makes more than the LOI champions do.
The LOI should mimic the GAA and have one team per county, that encapsulates the whole county rater than a town/city. Its crazy for a medium European size city like Dublin having 5 teams – 2 at most, the league will never prosper with these small Parochial clubs! Build a few academies and nurture our young footballers like Belgium have done!
Martayyy – That attitude about the LOI is why we play MUCK football, if we don’t have a healthy domestic league, how are we going to have a successful national team, but i guess u like most Irish people are content with England’s hand-me-downs and Watching the likes of chelsea and man u from your arm chair.
If we didnt have the granny rule, there is now way Irl would of qualified for the finals in the 80′s, 90′s and possibly 2002. F.A.I – lures OUT!
I used to go and watch LOI but after one league game when my team played frustrating football and got slaughtered to then see a number of players in the pub in their club trackies full and laughing and joking about the match sickened me, why should I pay upwards of 15e to watch players not even try then use whatever small wage the club gives to go out and get pissed…problem with lower end LOI teams is the majority don’t give a damn if they win lose or draw as long as there’s a piss up and its the fans that suffer so I’m not paying for that…
Low wages = poor attitude (especially from the older pros who have no incentive or motivation)
Maybe then, if more fans attended, clubs could offer better wages, attract more professional, higher calibre players, more competition and this in turn would drastically improve existing player attitudes.
IRFU and GAA are only self sustaining because they have fans paying money to attend games every year (average GAA championship attendance was 16 542 in 2012) that’s almost the same as all LOI clubs put together) , if like with LOI, the fans stopped attending matches tomorrow, both organisations would be screwed!
We could rely on England to develop our players back in the 80s and 90s because back then the prem lge was almost entirely uk and irish players, now that figure is is only 30% however, so we’re relying on converted Nordies, Glasweigans and 3rd generation irish (English) to carry the national team…. This is why a better irish domestic Lge with much more fans attending is so badly needed more than it ever was before.
Coleman best of the bunch….McClean needed more than a cameo. Well fired up wen he came on. O’dea showing that Toronto would be pumped by Senior League of I side….
I think most of the Journals ratings are unfair. I thought Forde was assured in goal and I don’t fret as much after Givens retirement. I also thought Sammon, Coleman, Mc Carthy , St ledger , McClean and even Andy Keogh did well. Lets not forget who we were playing. It’s just a shame we didn’t hold onto the ball a bit better and longer after we won it back.
All n all I thought it was a good match and I was glad I stayed up to watch it.
Having said that I did switch off when the second goal went in!
COYBIG!
Totally agree. Well said. The amount if blocks St. Ledger made deserved a better rating. Great performance from the boys in green ( or black as it was last night)
Don’t start with this ante-Keane shite again. Germany 02, Spain pen 02, Italy away 09, France away 09… correct me if I’m wrong but they are all former world champions.
Keane is in the all time top 20 international scorers. Yes he has scored a lot against the minnows, but he has also delivered for us on the big stage when we really needed him. Deserves his acclaim.
The sooner we get trap out the better,our tactic last night was for forde to kick a long ball to sammon,sammon didnt even win one header and spain didnt even have to break sweat to win it back,keogh ahead of mclean was a disgrace,meyler being treated now the way coleman and mccarthy used to be is a disgrace aswell,this man is holding us back so much he’s breaking the hearts of so many talented irish players
I know that the scores are all subjective but I thought that McCarthy had a really good game and didnt look out of place against the best midfield in the world.
Coleman had a good first half but faded in the second.
Sammon worked hard and showed a good turn of pace but rarely threatened other than his clear chance which should have at least tested the keeper.
Keane again showed that while he might still be our best finisher he doesnt contribute enough when he drops deep anymore. Age is catching up with him. But still should be in the squad.
Forde has been the best “find” for the Irish team this season, even tho he is well into his 30s.
McClean, although limited, is a much better option on the wing than either Keogh or Cox, neither of whom should get within a mile of the national team.
Thought McCarthy and Hendrick did well, especially considering the formation. Hendrick didn’t win the ball too much, but looked good when he was on it. Damming second touch completely closed his angle for the shit, shame though, cause Piqué had given up, so he’d loads of time. Good to see them out it up to Spain though and take control at times
These “player rating” articles on here always feel poorly considered. St Ledger deserves far more the 1 point above O’Dea as does McCarthy.
McClean and Sammon both rated 5- on par with Cox’s performance? Did you actually watch the match?
Mickey Harte: 'In my own head and heart, I said this team is good enough'
1 hr ago
0
FreeWrap
Robert Lewandowski's astonishing season for Barca continues
9 hrs ago
1
As it happened
Kerry v Mayo, GAA Division 1 football league final
16 hrs ago
18
Sign in or create a free account
To continue reading create a free account
Or sign into an existing account
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.Privacy Policy
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
I could have wrote McShanes match report before the game started!!
good,good
Just think of the players the country would produce if even just a quarter of the money pumped into GAA was put into soccer instead.
Couldn’t care less if Spain are the best team in the world, that was an absolute shocking game from Ireland yet again, horrible football. Most of our players are utterly dreadful.
And let our national sport die ! Real intelligent there !!
Yes but remember which game is the professional one….. Should be self sufficient. Maybe if delaney the donkey and co took a pay cut and led by example it might be a step in the right direction.
Why would we take money out of a successful sport and pump it into a sport that has never managed to achieve traction in Ireland…
I would argue that we should take some of the money in GAA & give it to the players…
Delaney and Co., are very well paid for a small Country and compare it to the Spanish FA boss? The problem is within, look there instead and demand action there!
What an utterly ridiculous comment.
That was directed at Popeye btw !!
@paul, no traction? Are you kidding me football is the most played sport on the island followed way down the line by gaelic football and then hurling with less than half of what football numbers achieve
What money is “pumped” into the GAA? Do you mean the way GAA clubs apply for and receive sports capital grants? Are you aware that these grants are open to and available for all sports clubs who get their act together to apply for them?
Spain has a population of 50 million and is soccer/football crazy. No amount of investment is going to swing that. Especially not when the best young Irish players get snapped up and coached in England.
Exactly. Keep blaming the GAA will get you nowhere.
You do mean your national sport.
Ok, so the the problem lies solely with Delaney not the barstoolers who stay at home and leave loi stadiums empty every friday, so we get rid of Delaney save 400k on his salary and then what??? We magically become a small, efficient football powerhouse like Croatia??…
No personally I think it’s going to take a little more than that, though I don’t doubt the FAI are a bunch of bandits, the interest and appetitive for domestic football just isn’t there in this country!
People prefer to spend their money on the gaa and the rugby, fair enough I say, but that being the case, lets not get all bitter and pretend we’re a football nation.
True Colm, but those stats are misleading because all those kids playing football give it up at 18 or switch to Gaelic, unless an English club signs them, there is a massive talent drain because tv LOI is neither amateur nor a lucrative professional league, it makes no financial sense to keep playing so they all quit at 18 and we lose out on all those potential stars.
Well said Aidan.
If the fai wasn’t full of idiots that might happen. The Gaa pays mostly for itself as does the ifru. They have common sense something the failure has none of. Look at kidney, he failed to develop the younger players and lost winnable games and he got sacked. Trap won’t even play some of our best players and he’s still there. Look at the aviva stadium. The irfu nearly has its half played off, the fai has only like 20% paid off (I forget the exact figure it was in the prime time documentary) and yet Delaney is paid more than his English Spanish and Italian counterparts combined. This has nothing to do with gaa favourtism, which will always be the most popular sport in Ireland regardless of public expenditure, and everything to do with the incompetence of the fai.
Its refreshing reading these positive comments about the LOI and how we can improve it rather than the usual BS drama from the EPL “is Jose coming back, is he, isn’t he”
The F.A.I-lures need to pull their head outta the sand, Delaney makes more than the LOI champions do.
The LOI should mimic the GAA and have one team per county, that encapsulates the whole county rater than a town/city. Its crazy for a medium European size city like Dublin having 5 teams – 2 at most, the league will never prosper with these small Parochial clubs! Build a few academies and nurture our young footballers like Belgium have done!
Why would anyone want to watch LOI football when it is worse than the muck the national team play??
Martayyy – That attitude about the LOI is why we play MUCK football, if we don’t have a healthy domestic league, how are we going to have a successful national team, but i guess u like most Irish people are content with England’s hand-me-downs and Watching the likes of chelsea and man u from your arm chair.
If we didnt have the granny rule, there is now way Irl would of qualified for the finals in the 80′s, 90′s and possibly 2002. F.A.I – lures OUT!
I used to go and watch LOI but after one league game when my team played frustrating football and got slaughtered to then see a number of players in the pub in their club trackies full and laughing and joking about the match sickened me, why should I pay upwards of 15e to watch players not even try then use whatever small wage the club gives to go out and get pissed…problem with lower end LOI teams is the majority don’t give a damn if they win lose or draw as long as there’s a piss up and its the fans that suffer so I’m not paying for that…
i agree, attitudes have to change
Low wages = poor attitude (especially from the older pros who have no incentive or motivation)
Maybe then, if more fans attended, clubs could offer better wages, attract more professional, higher calibre players, more competition and this in turn would drastically improve existing player attitudes.
IRFU and GAA are only self sustaining because they have fans paying money to attend games every year (average GAA championship attendance was 16 542 in 2012) that’s almost the same as all LOI clubs put together) , if like with LOI, the fans stopped attending matches tomorrow, both organisations would be screwed!
We could rely on England to develop our players back in the 80s and 90s because back then the prem lge was almost entirely uk and irish players, now that figure is is only 30% however, so we’re relying on converted Nordies, Glasweigans and 3rd generation irish (English) to carry the national team…. This is why a better irish domestic Lge with much more fans attending is so badly needed more than it ever was before.
Coleman best of the bunch….McClean needed more than a cameo. Well fired up wen he came on. O’dea showing that Toronto would be pumped by Senior League of I side….
Be handy to post score at top of report
Sammon deserves better than a 5! I thought he played well.
I think most of the Journals ratings are unfair. I thought Forde was assured in goal and I don’t fret as much after Givens retirement. I also thought Sammon, Coleman, Mc Carthy , St ledger , McClean and even Andy Keogh did well. Lets not forget who we were playing. It’s just a shame we didn’t hold onto the ball a bit better and longer after we won it back.
All n all I thought it was a good match and I was glad I stayed up to watch it.
Having said that I did switch off when the second goal went in!
COYBIG!
Totally agree. Well said. The amount if blocks St. Ledger made deserved a better rating. Great performance from the boys in green ( or black as it was last night)
Ive seen street league players better than mcshane.
Don’t start with this ante-Keane shite again. Germany 02, Spain pen 02, Italy away 09, France away 09… correct me if I’m wrong but they are all former world champions.
Keane is in the all time top 20 international scorers. Yes he has scored a lot against the minnows, but he has also delivered for us on the big stage when we really needed him. Deserves his acclaim.
The sooner we get trap out the better,our tactic last night was for forde to kick a long ball to sammon,sammon didnt even win one header and spain didnt even have to break sweat to win it back,keogh ahead of mclean was a disgrace,meyler being treated now the way coleman and mccarthy used to be is a disgrace aswell,this man is holding us back so much he’s breaking the hearts of so many talented irish players
I know that the scores are all subjective but I thought that McCarthy had a really good game and didnt look out of place against the best midfield in the world.
Coleman had a good first half but faded in the second.
Sammon worked hard and showed a good turn of pace but rarely threatened other than his clear chance which should have at least tested the keeper.
Keane again showed that while he might still be our best finisher he doesnt contribute enough when he drops deep anymore. Age is catching up with him. But still should be in the squad.
Forde has been the best “find” for the Irish team this season, even tho he is well into his 30s.
McClean, although limited, is a much better option on the wing than either Keogh or Cox, neither of whom should get within a mile of the national team.
Keane anonymous against quality opposition? You must be joking I don’t believe it
I don’t believe it either, sure he scored a hat trick against the faroes!!
We spend the entire night chasing shadows
Thought McCarthy and Hendrick did well, especially considering the formation. Hendrick didn’t win the ball too much, but looked good when he was on it. Damming second touch completely closed his angle for the shit, shame though, cause Piqué had given up, so he’d loads of time. Good to see them out it up to Spain though and take control at times
“Sammon second touch closed his angle for the shot.” Pretty bad autocorrect.
These “player rating” articles on here always feel poorly considered. St Ledger deserves far more the 1 point above O’Dea as does McCarthy.
McClean and Sammon both rated 5- on par with Cox’s performance? Did you actually watch the match?