“Fabrice Muamba remains in intensive care at The London Chest Hospital. He is continuing to show signs of improvement this evening.
“He is now able to breathe independently without the aid of a ventilator. He has also been able to recognise family members and respond to questions appropriately.
“These are all positive signs of progress.However, the medical staff in intensive care will continue to monitor and treat him.
Advertisement
“His family and club would like to thank the media for continuing to respect their privacy at this time.”
Earlier, a friend of Muamba said the Bolton midfielder’s family reported he’d started speaking again, two days after going into cardiac arrest during a match.
Curtis Codrington told The Associated Press after talking to Muamba’s family Monday that his friend had spoken “minimal words in English and French, which is better than nothing.”
Codrington has been visiting Muamba in intensive care since the player collapsed during Saturday’s match at Tottenham.
Earlier, the hospital said Muamba had begun to show “small signs of improvement.” His heart started beating without the help of medication Monday and his arms and legs were moving. But the statement emphasised that he remained in critical condition.
In a joint statement with the hospital treating Muamba, the club said today he was also moving his arms and his legs.
But the statement cautions that “his long-term prognosis will remain unclear for some time. He is still critically ill.”
The midfielder suffered a cardiac arrest during an FA Cup match at Tottenham on Saturday. The 23-year-old’s heart started beating on its own again only when he arrived at a London hospital’s heart attack unit Saturday night.
The player’s fiancee has been issuing pleas on Twitter for the health of Muamba, who proposed on Valentine’s Day. The couple has a 3-year-old son, Joshua.
“There is a real hope he can come through this. When situations like this occur there is a real strength, a real unity, a real togetherness … that has given (the family) an incredible energy,” Coyle said outside the east London hospital. “That source of energy that everyone is giving off is really bringing them together as a family and that is important for Fabrice’s well being.”
Tough, but I like that they are maintaining the integrity of the content by not going the advertising route.
Seriously, a fiver a month? That’s only two rounds of drinks on a night out, for 5 hours of entertainment a week? I’ll be subscribing, and fair play to them for trying to make it work. Too many nae Sayers in Ireland
Well worth a fiver….I’m paying a fiver sterling a month for The Anfield Wrap and it only makes me cry at the moment. They deserve to make a living like everyone else…pay if you like them enough, don’t pay if you don’t.
I did too until there were far too many podcasts being released and I no longer had the time to listen to them all. Beyond that, much of it was filler as they had to come up with much more material. It lost its essence I think. I hope it doesn’t happen with Second Captains.
I usually liked Second Captains, picked a chose what episodes I downloaded based on the description. Certainly won’t be paying for their ‘extra’ content. They should just have some advertising on their show to keep it free for listeners. Can’t see this model being sustainable….
wedn6night rugby is dreadful gilroy and gerry thornley talking bollix about guys playing in the pocket and building platforms to play wide expansive rugby to get over the gain line like two toffs in kiely’ s over a fine malt and salmon sandwiches absolute torture.
Does anyone else think the off the ball lads getting very cringey lately.The Shearer interview last week was very awkward stupid comments and quotes bout Gullit then Bellamy then Keane just to make each other laugh
Sam Beckett, the fake banter on Off the ball is very annoying, there’s zero chemistry and a lot of forced laughter. Second captains were a huge loss. Indeed Newstalk is gone down the tubes apart from Moncrief
Did you not hear the Armstrong, David Walsh or Cathaal McCarron interviews lately? Thought they were the best sports interviews of the year to be honest.
You’ve got to be joking me, Joe Molloy is so lacking in any kind of personality or character I fully expect him to turn into an actual drone. Murf isn’t everyone’s cup of tea, but McDevitt keeps him honest, he doesn’t speak with a dull D4 accent which always helps, and he’s played a bit of football so you can relate to him, plus they clearly get on extremely well in a natural way unlike the forced banter on Off the ball now
I wish these lads were still on NewsTalk so much better than Molloy and Gilroy. I could just about bare it when Wolly was there, since he left it’s been a disaster.
I couldn’t agree more, the likes of Wolly and Gizzy Lyng made it just about bearable. Molloy and Gilroy are sports journalists in the worst sense of the word, they’re incredibly dull and are trying to copy the second captains in such an inane way
There are loads of sports shows, with plenty of coverage of sport, Second captains were one of the first to combine it with character and personality amongst a group of young lads who had good chemistry and could talk about anything
Gilroy’s interview of Lance Armstrong was class journalism, and I wouldn’t miss the newspaper review for anything.
I’ll definitely be paying for the subscription service with Second Captains. It’s a fiver. A month. And like it or not most podcasts are eyeing that model. Graham Hunter’s had to fund raise to keep it going ffs.
Jesus lads, stop moaning and criticising. Two very enjoyable shows to listen to and enjoy.
No, he should delete his comment because he said Gilroy was a “journalist in the worse sense of the word” and I gave one example amongst many of why the reverse is true. If McDevitt feels it acceptable to celebrate ppl like McCarron yet insult someone like Conor McGregor (and his fans for that matter) for trivial behaviour then how can he be journalistically more credible than any sports broadcaster?
Well Gilroy does like to make thinks about himself on occasion and when it comes to being the better presenter McDevitt wins my a long shot. Don’t know if I’d pin the title Journalist on either of them as such. McDevitt didn’t celebrate McCarron, but Gilroy did do the better interview. I know they said they had received contact from the girls family before he was interviewed hence the few weeks of a delay so maybe that explains why it was more hard hitting. Yeah McDevitt could have when harder but to say he celebrated him is a bit off. Did he insult some of McGregors trivial behaviour? Was this when he threw glass into a crowd of people? I don’t recall. As for the fans, sure most of them are great. They were really classy when aldo was in town.
Your reply perfectly illustrates my point. Complete refusal to acknowledge that the fans who were at that presser are not the majority ( are we really going to say that such a segment doesn’t exist for PL football or boxing etc) I’m referring to the real MMA fans that appreciate the 15/25min of actual competitive endeavour and know to ignore the rest of the pageantry. Of course 2ndCs would never generate the traffic they do if they were to report objectively, it pays to trash McGregor and his ilk because that’s what listeners want to hear, not a balanced report on sport ( excuse the pun ). Your not paying a €5r a month for high standard, accurate reporting, your paying to hear your own opinion confirmed to you in a sneering elitist tone. Say what you want about the OTB teams personalities but I’ve never felt they’ve pushed a specific perception for ratings or money, they just report the news and respect people’s right to enjoy what floats their boat.
@Kevin Power: Well McDevitt just approached it differently. Gilroy just responded to the fathers request if i remember. McDevitt called out Jim McGuinness’s hypocrisy if i remember
People slating the personality of Ger Gilroy while stating their preference for a show with Ken Early. The mind boggles. The first time I ever felt the need to text a radio station was about 14 years ago and I was listening to Ken Early spew nonsense.
I’ll be signing up as it’s the pod I’d listen to before otb, the guardian etc. I’ll give it a few months but we’ll have to see how the content is split up.
Some times more content isn’t always better. The Monday slot will cover the weekends sport. The football and rugby will finish in may. Are they going to have huge content on gaa then? Like most here like there podcast but won’t be a sub. Can’t see the value. #cantpaywontpay
I think a lot of the listeners are Irish overseas. It can be very hard to get GAA news, RTE/TV3 punditry, Match of the Day etc. €5 a month isn’t too much to pay for good content when our access to it overseas is limited.
Loved them on off the ball, but I am not going to pay to listen to them. Wish there TV show was just them giving analysis, not the disjointed show that was aired. Cut the crowd just have one guest from one code on at a time simple TV.
Leinster football semi-finals moved out of Croke Park for first time in 30 years
12 mins ago
0
Freerock the mic
GAA+ announce summer schedule with 40 games covered
14 mins ago
0
As it happened
Kerry v Mayo, GAA Division 1 football league final
23 hrs ago
18
Sign in or create a free account
To continue reading create a free account
Or sign into an existing account
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.Privacy Policy
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
I wouldn’t neccisarily agree with anything Ken Early says about football
Isn’t that a quote from Johnny Giles if I’m not mistaken
So many podcasts out there free. Subscription model is tough.
Tough, but I like that they are maintaining the integrity of the content by not going the advertising route.
Seriously, a fiver a month? That’s only two rounds of drinks on a night out, for 5 hours of entertainment a week? I’ll be subscribing, and fair play to them for trying to make it work. Too many nae Sayers in Ireland
Ever so slightly too expensive lads, ye’re not fecking Netflix!
Well worth a fiver….I’m paying a fiver sterling a month for The Anfield Wrap and it only makes me cry at the moment. They deserve to make a living like everyone else…pay if you like them enough, don’t pay if you don’t.
fools and their money.
@paul seriously you don’t really spend £5 a month for a podcast about Liverpool mon ta fuk.
@paul £5 for the Anfield wrap? You should klopp on to yourself!
I did too until there were far too many podcasts being released and I no longer had the time to listen to them all. Beyond that, much of it was filler as they had to come up with much more material. It lost its essence I think. I hope it doesn’t happen with Second Captains.
Hmmm? So from 4 free episodes to 2 free and 4 paid for… I love the show, and yes 5 quid isn’t a lot of money… but just can’t see me making the move.
And if the free episodes devote too much time trailing the paid for ones I can see this costing them listeners.
Still best of luck to them
I usually liked Second Captains, picked a chose what episodes I downloaded based on the description. Certainly won’t be paying for their ‘extra’ content. They should just have some advertising on their show to keep it free for listeners. Can’t see this model being sustainable….
Like them, but won’t be paying for it. Plenty of free podcasts out there to make up for it. Best of luck though lads.
You’d essentially be paying for all that rugby talk which I’m convinced everyone fast forwards anyway….!
Agreed, rugby never off both shows.. totally out of proportion to active participation of the game.. sick of listening to it..
That’s the Irish media for you, the way they hyped up that Irish team last week I was almost glad they lost
@Denis McDermott: Mcdevitt asks shane horgan one question and hes off talking rogbish for 30 mins, it’s terrible.
wedn6night rugby is dreadful gilroy and gerry thornley talking bollix about guys playing in the pocket and building platforms to play wide expansive rugby to get over the gain line like two toffs in kiely’ s over a fine malt and salmon sandwiches absolute torture.
Go forward momentum, line breaks, offloads, line speed… ugh, it’s like the worst kind “bizness” jargon transplanted into sport
me favourite is what gilroy says consistently ‘we ‘coughed up possession’ awful nonsense all together.
Can’t disagree but Eddie O’Sullivan does have rest interesting stuff to say!
Does anyone else think the off the ball lads getting very cringey lately.The Shearer interview last week was very awkward stupid comments and quotes bout Gullit then Bellamy then Keane just to make each other laugh
I like Joe Molloy. Always felt like Ger Gilroy thinks he’s better than me. Sad!
Sam Beckett, the fake banter on Off the ball is very annoying, there’s zero chemistry and a lot of forced laughter. Second captains were a huge loss. Indeed Newstalk is gone down the tubes apart from Moncrief
To say there is zero chemistry is ott. Some times the laughs can be too big and ladish but sure there is always rte sport.
I would actually listen to moncrieff all day long. Best show on radio.
Did you not hear the Armstrong, David Walsh or Cathaal McCarron interviews lately? Thought they were the best sports interviews of the year to be honest.
It’s awful stuff. I gave up on that years ago.
@Sam Beckett: Im finding the “banter” toward Kilbane is beginning to grate. A lot.
Best podcast show in Ireland
@Aidan O connor: by a distance. 5 euro is great value.
RTE should get rid of dead weight bring in second captains boys
Nah when they are on rte radio it’s not the same show, imo.
‘World service’ i.e a website.
It’s a joke about the BBC world service.
The ‘independent online station’ hot air stuff makes me think the BBC was more of an inspiration
@Caelum Rosenkranz: No Caelum listen to Liam, he actually knows what he’s talking about
@Liam Mc Loughlin: Not a very good joke.
Good luck to them but it’s a tough job with so much free stuff available. I’m out.
Pay to listen to Ken Earley? No thanks..
It’s Ken Burley actually
Ciaran Murphy is one annoying presenter. Don’t listen to it anymore. Off the ball and Joe molloy far far superior
You’ve got to be joking me, Joe Molloy is so lacking in any kind of personality or character I fully expect him to turn into an actual drone. Murf isn’t everyone’s cup of tea, but McDevitt keeps him honest, he doesn’t speak with a dull D4 accent which always helps, and he’s played a bit of football so you can relate to him, plus they clearly get on extremely well in a natural way unlike the forced banter on Off the ball now
They should make one of the pods a political show ..and the other an anti mcgregor one..
I wish these lads were still on NewsTalk so much better than Molloy and Gilroy. I could just about bare it when Wolly was there, since he left it’s been a disaster.
I couldn’t agree more, the likes of Wolly and Gizzy Lyng made it just about bearable. Molloy and Gilroy are sports journalists in the worst sense of the word, they’re incredibly dull and are trying to copy the second captains in such an inane way
Harsh. And Gilroy was there before any of them so he’s hardly copying them. You have 2 good sports shows so why moan?
I’d have to disagree with you but feel free to pay for the new service. I’m happy with off the ball.
There are loads of sports shows, with plenty of coverage of sport, Second captains were one of the first to combine it with character and personality amongst a group of young lads who had good chemistry and could talk about anything
Gilroy’s interview of Lance Armstrong was class journalism, and I wouldn’t miss the newspaper review for anything.
I’ll definitely be paying for the subscription service with Second Captains. It’s a fiver. A month. And like it or not most podcasts are eyeing that model. Graham Hunter’s had to fund raise to keep it going ffs.
Jesus lads, stop moaning and criticising. Two very enjoyable shows to listen to and enjoy.
Listen to Eoin McDevitt interview Cathal McCarron, Then listen to Ger Gilroy interview Cathal McCarron Then delete your comment
He should delete his comment because of one interview?
No, he should delete his comment because he said Gilroy was a “journalist in the worse sense of the word” and I gave one example amongst many of why the reverse is true. If McDevitt feels it acceptable to celebrate ppl like McCarron yet insult someone like Conor McGregor (and his fans for that matter) for trivial behaviour then how can he be journalistically more credible than any sports broadcaster?
Well Gilroy does like to make thinks about himself on occasion and when it comes to being the better presenter McDevitt wins my a long shot. Don’t know if I’d pin the title Journalist on either of them as such. McDevitt didn’t celebrate McCarron, but Gilroy did do the better interview. I know they said they had received contact from the girls family before he was interviewed hence the few weeks of a delay so maybe that explains why it was more hard hitting. Yeah McDevitt could have when harder but to say he celebrated him is a bit off. Did he insult some of McGregors trivial behaviour? Was this when he threw glass into a crowd of people? I don’t recall. As for the fans, sure most of them are great. They were really classy when aldo was in town.
Your reply perfectly illustrates my point. Complete refusal to acknowledge that the fans who were at that presser are not the majority ( are we really going to say that such a segment doesn’t exist for PL football or boxing etc) I’m referring to the real MMA fans that appreciate the 15/25min of actual competitive endeavour and know to ignore the rest of the pageantry. Of course 2ndCs would never generate the traffic they do if they were to report objectively, it pays to trash McGregor and his ilk because that’s what listeners want to hear, not a balanced report on sport ( excuse the pun ). Your not paying a €5r a month for high standard, accurate reporting, your paying to hear your own opinion confirmed to you in a sneering elitist tone. Say what you want about the OTB teams personalities but I’ve never felt they’ve pushed a specific perception for ratings or money, they just report the news and respect people’s right to enjoy what floats their boat.
Glad I illustrated your point for you. That must have been satisfying.
@Kevin Power: Well McDevitt just approached it differently. Gilroy just responded to the fathers request if i remember. McDevitt called out Jim McGuinness’s hypocrisy if i remember
Won’t work but good luck
Never heard of it .. Don’t think I would pay €5 a mth to listen to it anyway.
But. . . . If you’ve never heard of it then how would you know?
People slating the personality of Ger Gilroy while stating their preference for a show with Ken Early. The mind boggles. The first time I ever felt the need to text a radio station was about 14 years ago and I was listening to Ken Early spew nonsense.
Sure everyone knows he talks rubbish, the lads slate him over it and rightly so.
I’ll be signing up as it’s the pod I’d listen to before otb, the guardian etc. I’ll give it a few months but we’ll have to see how the content is split up.
Some times more content isn’t always better. The Monday slot will cover the weekends sport. The football and rugby will finish in may. Are they going to have huge content on gaa then? Like most here like there podcast but won’t be a sub. Can’t see the value. #cantpaywontpay
I think Eoin McDevitt is wonderful. Ken Early reminds me of some flame haired flame thrower of truth who thinks very cogently about the game.
Are they finished doing the TV show on RTE?
Tv show was too scripted in my opinion, still some good moments and some great parodies
Yeah never got into the TV show. Audio suits them better, not that the show was bad.
And they’re all weird looking fellas…
I think a lot of the listeners are Irish overseas. It can be very hard to get GAA news, RTE/TV3 punditry, Match of the Day etc. €5 a month isn’t too much to pay for good content when our access to it overseas is limited.
€5 no thanks. Off the ball all the way
The guardian pod with James Richardson is the best around.
@Martin Carter: No way. Barry Glendenning is on that and he is awful.
I’d pay the 5r for 1 McDevitt/Murph free show a week tbh
I forgot about these clowns
Loved them on off the ball, but I am not going to pay to listen to them. Wish there TV show was just them giving analysis, not the disjointed show that was aired. Cut the crowd just have one guest from one code on at a time simple TV.