The Score uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Saturday 18 May, 2013

‘I’d apologise to David Walsh’ – what we learned from Lance/Oprah, part 2

The harm that Lance Armstrong caused his family, sponsors and fellow cancer survivors by years of lying and denials of doping was under the spotlight tonight.

Image: screengrab

TONIGHT WE WERE treated to the second part of Lance Armstrong’s ‘no-holds barred’ interview with Oprah Winfrey. But there wasn’t much holding at all with the host sitting back and letting Armstrong take charge. Tonight’s broadcast focused more on the shamed rider’s sponsors, the effect his actions have had on his family and his future plans. Here are the main take-away points.

  • So we begin with the sponsors. ‘Nike called and said they were out. And then the calls started coming,’ the rider said. Armstrong described the couple of days when he lost his backers as ‘not a fun point’ and his ‘worst nightmare’. But he characterises the day he lost the support of his own Livestrong foundation as the most humbling moment of his demise. Can the charity live without Lance’s story, Oprah asks. ‘I hope so’ is the response.
  • Armstrong doesn’t think that PEDS contributed to his contracting cancer.
  • When asked if he’d apologise to the Sunday Times’ David Walsh, the former Tour legend laughs, half-commits to saying sorry an apology and then Oprah moves on inexcusably.
  • Okay, world… he reckons he deserves the chance to compete again. “Hell, yes. I’m a competitor. It’s what I’ve done my whole life. I love to train. I love to race. Not the Tour de France, but there’s a lot of other things I could do. I deserve to be punished. I’m not sure that I deserve a death penalty.”
  • What about that tweet he sent about kicking back at home in Austin with his seven yellow jerseys? Just more defiance he shrugged. “You know what’s scary, I though it was a good idea at the time.” When was this – a month-and-a- half ago?
  • Kirsten, Lance’s ex-wife. was on a need-to-know basis throughout their years together. But she was the one person Armstrong asked if he could make the Tour comeback. The Texan says she made him swear he wouldn’t dope if he did so.
  • ‘What do you tell your 13-year-old kid?’  Predictably, we have the first sign of tears in his eyes and an admission that he had to tell his son the truth over Christmas. He told Luke to stop defending his father in public and instead say ‘my dad says sorry’.
  • Armstrong says he didn’t try to pay off USADA with the supposed offer of a $150k donation, which Travis Tygart mentioned in an interview last week. ‘Why wasn’t that in the report?’ Armstrong asks.
  • He says the financial cost is ‘all future income’. The time he lost those sponsors? A £75 million dollar day, he reckons.
  • Armstrong says he’s deeply sorry and doesn’t know what the future holds. He reckons he’s going to be a better human being after this ‘process’. Oprah tells him the truth will set him free. He doesn’t look convinced.

More to follow

Liveblog: The Lance Armstrong-Oprah Winfrey interview, Part 2

Read next:

Comments (15 Comments)

  • Blah blah blah

    Reply
    • Amazing how many celebrity personalities lives are a complete fiction. Lance Armstrong, the Clintons, Giouliani, Patreas. Celebrity status isn’t worth the price in terms of drugs for sportspeople, lies n favors for politicians. Media destroying society glamorising idiots like overpaid sportspeople, Paris Hilton, Big Brother winners, Tallafornia, Geordie shore. Vomit inducing.

      Reply
    • Bo bo 19/01/13 #

      Totally agree. “Celebrity” rubbish. Everyone has flaws. Give me self achievers every time. Mark pollock for example. Now there’s inspiration for the greater good.
      I love cycling but after reading Armstrong books I did not like his attitude to do whatever it takes and to win at all costs. This celeb culture is disgusting. Positive realistic role models are what’s needed.

      Reply
    • Absolutely correct , a dirtbird of the lowest. Found out & exposed now and having reckoned that his only way of recovering the Dollar earning potential in the future, was to own up!
      With these type of people – it’s always about the Dollar !
      Will he return the monies derived from his various libel cases though ? That is the question now – with about a 500% compensation to those wronged , I would suggest ?

      Reply
  • I don’t particularly care that he took PEDs, they were all at it. Why I really dislike him and what he didn’t address is the way he used lawsuits and the media to bully everyone into silence when they were telling the truth. That’s what is unforgivable in my eyes. Appearing in a rehearsed PR stunt with Oprah does nothing to change that.
    I hope his lifetime ban stands, this farce has changed nothing.

    Reply
  • pg 19/01/13 #

    There is only one thing for it… Set Vincent Browne on him!!

    Reply
  • As far as interviewers go in this specific case operah was useless – the wrong questions were asked and things moved quickly over

    Reply
  • That surely can’t be the end of this! It’s a typical Oprah show talking about the family etc. but surely he can’t get off with just this muck.

    Reply
  • Lance interviews are like Tiger apologies….
    A load of American, over produced insincere bullshit!!

    Reply
  • Lance picked Oprah to do this interview with him, do you think he did that because of her “Vincent Browne” style of asking questions? It’s so obvious that this was a face saving exercise for Lance, he really thinks that that horse hasn’t bolted yet! Totes amaze ball….s

    Reply
  • He should never be allowed near competitive sport again. He at the very least deserves to serve the lifetime ban. Kimmage was right his only regret was being caught. Sick individual.

    Reply
  • She kind of forced him into his David Walsh apology. He didn’t really sound too convincing, mumbling through it. No mention of Paul Kimmage. He definitely deserves an apology too. I feel sorry for lances kids. For their image of their father to be shattered must have been awful for them. As a father of young children myself, I hope I never have to tell them what he had to, that everything they believed about him was wrong and not to defend him anymore. What an awful thing to have to tell your kids. As I said, no sympathy for LA from me, but for the kids, definitely.

    Reply
  • The smug p**ck should be locked up. He still can’t tell the truth. He didn’t care who he destroyed on his way up. The higher you climb the harder you fall. I hope everyone who can sues him

    Reply

Add New Comment