Advertisement
Joubert is one of several referees to have encountered criticism during this World Cup. Barry Aldworth/Sports Inc/Press Association Images
Protests

French accuse Joubert of favourtism towards New Zealand

Players including Dimitri Szarzewski have indicated that the officiating on Sunday was unacceptable.

FRENCH PLAYERS HAVE complained after South African referee Craig Joubert made a number of contentious decisions that went against them during Sunday’s Rugby World Cup final.

While New Zealand gained an early lead in the first half, France recovered to dominate the second period, with Joubert seemingly failing to spot a number of infringements that would have earned them a much-needed penalty to potentially win the match.

France’s Dimitri Szarzewski led the protests, controversially suggesting to reporters that the referee had favoured the hosts: “Mr. Joubert was not brave. It was a World Cup final. I wanted things to be fair. And that was not the case.”

Szarzewski’s teammate, Maxime Mermoz, backed up his criticism of Joubert, claiming:

“I took a punch from Weepu right in the ear. I couldn’t hear anything and I still can’t hear well now. And the referee didn’t whistle.”

Meanwhile, Morgan Parra refrained from openly criticising the officiating, but said: “I think we deserved better.”

New Zealand beat France 8-7 on Sunday, and consequently won the Web Ellis trophy for the first time since the inaugural World Cup tournament in 1987.

Poll: Did Stephen Donald actually score his match-winning penalty>

Read: The wait is over for New Zealand… but only just>

Your Voice
Readers Comments
1
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.