The Score uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 7 °C Saturday 18 May, 2013

Betfair defends decision to void Leopardstown bets

The gambling giant has moved to repair its reputation after an “obvious technical fault” saw them void €25m of winning bets yesterday.

Andrew Lynch on board Voler la Vedette in yesterday's woodiesdiy.com Christmas Hurdle.
Andrew Lynch on board Voler la Vedette in yesterday's woodiesdiy.com Christmas Hurdle.
Image: ©INPHO/Cathal Noonan

BETFAIR HAS DENIED any allegations of dodgy dealing as a storm of criticism continues to rage over its decision to void €25m worth of winning bets yesterday.

The popular betting exchange voided all in-running bets on the woodiesdiy.com Christmas Hurdle at Leopardstown after an “obvious technical fault” allowed eagle-eyed punters to back the second favourite, Voler la Vedette, at mid-race odds of 28/1.

Over €1.9m was successfully matched before the market was frozen, leaving hundreds of punters in limbo as they waited to see if they would be able to cash in on the fancied mare’s four-and-three-quarter length victory.

Betfair immediately opened an investigation and voided the in-running market three hours later when technicians discovered a glitch which had apparently allowed a customer to exceed their exposure limit to the tune of €700m.

In a second statement issued today, the gambling giant apologised once again for the mistake which has seen its share price plummet by 6% in the last 36 hours.

Firstly, we would like to re-iterate that anyone betting in-running in yesterday’s Leopardstown race clearly received a very poor customer service and betting experience. We apologise once again for this.

We have identified the issue and replicated it in a test environment last night. A fix was applied overnight, and is now subject to rigorous testing. A further update on this will be made today.

Contrary to some media speculation, we can confirm that all in-running bets on this market would have been voided, had Voler La Vadette won or lost. There was never any chance of the account in question profiting yesterday. The account in question was also immediately suspended after the Leopardstown race.

There has been some criticism from customers, and in the press, that Betfair took too long to void. Quite simply, we made the decision after we were in full possession of the all the facts and input from the relevant internal departments. A decision was then made to void in accordance with our terms and conditions.

We will update when more information is available.

Betfair pins €25m Leopardstown blunder on ‘obvious technical fault’

Synchronised times it perfectly to take the Lexus

Read next:

Comments (8 Comments)

  • A wise man once said THE BOOKIE ALWAYS WINS…….

    Reply
  • I can see a few court cases over this one coming!

    Reply
    • Bets are not under contract law, their considered a gentleman’s agreement which is not enforceable by law so no court action can arise from this, only thing that can happen is reputation damage

      Reply
  • No one has answered the simple question I asked, namely how does not paying out build confidence, trust, whatever you want to call it, in the company? It just doesn’t look right not to pay out. Punters who chug large sums down the drain, don’t get the opportunity to cancel their stake after a bad turn and put it all down to an error. And since it involves an Irish race course, why the bloody hell aren’t the government ministers banging the table about the consumer?

    Reply
  • There’s a lot of nonsense posted in the comments of these threads. Here are the facts:

    1. Bets in the UK became legally enforceable under the Gambling Act 2005 introduced in 2007.
    2. Betfair is an exchange but it operates under a bookmaker’s licence. It just happens to be a bookmaker who lays off every bet immediately.
    3. The “palpable” rule in the terms and conditions of most bookmakers will very likely be voided as an unfair contract term when it is eventually challenged in a court of law.
    4. Betfair had previously refused to cancel similar obvious errors in other markets. They have just opened the door to all those claims to be challenged in court.

    Reply
    • Completely agree John. I don’t see why people comment on a topic that they either don’t have a vested interest in or who’s opinion is incorrect/unsubstantiated. Giving you negative thumbs as I’m sure this comment will receive achieves what exactly?! If people don’t agree with a comment fair enough but when you state the cold hard facts, one wonders why the negative reaction? And if I read somewhere again that bookies never lose, palpable error etc, I ask why do these people need to comment?

      And to reiterate my point again from yesterday, I have a vested interest (all be it very minor in the grand scheme of things) in the outcome but I am not going to make assumptions over what happened until Betfair fully conclude on it tomorrow. If this was a genuine error, how the market was not frozen immediately (which has happened plenty times previous for a variety of reasons) and not left in play for a further 5 minutes to the finish line like any other race, is inexcusable. Having trawled though the Betfair forums over the last 2 days there are many assumptions made and each poking holes in the next one but there are some fascinating reads whereby other punters have had their fingers burned for whatever reason and so why should this be treated different? Other than the amount being incredibly large, this error would not have been noticed and the punter laying would not be getting refunded.

      Anyway rant over. I am not saying I expect full compensation of the value or am necessarily entitled to all of it, all I do want is a full and frank explanation of what did happen. Otherwise, as was seen in the stock makret their share valuation falling further today, the impact on their share price will far outweigh the cost of compensating backers.

      Reply
  • How does not paying out bolster their reputation?

    Reply
  • I’ve often complained to Betfair about their software. IT boss should be fired.

    Reply

Add New Comment