- Australia's largest state hits record-high COVID-19 cases despite weeks of strict lockdown. 'It's a tinderbox ready to explode,' one official said.
- eToro says crypto made up 73% of trading commissions in the last quarter, as retail customers dived in
- A flight attendant says she was too exhausted to report a passenger who shoved her when a flight was overbooked: report
- US jobless claims climb for first time in 5 weeks, to 353,000
FOLLOWING YESTERDAY’S RELEASE of the bombshell USADA report on Lance Armstrong’s alleged history of doping, many are taking a second look at Armstrong’s past.
One of the most shocking moments of that past, first found by journalist Bill Gifford and posted by Robert Mackey to the New York Times’ Lede Blog, comes from this sworn deposition from 2005.
At the time Armstrong’s company was suing SCA Promotions after they refused to honour an agreement to pay him for winning five consecutive Tours de Frances.
The group argued he must been using performance enhancing drugs, but Armstrong — under oath — said he did not. He went on to add that he didn’t use these drugs, not just for professional reasons, but also he would lose “the faith of all of the cancer survivors around the world.”
The section begins around 2.50.
YouTube: TheDosPelotas
This of course raises uncomfortable questions. Armstrong is perhaps one of the most well-known cancer survivors in the world — he was famously given just a 40% chance of survival — and has established a large and successful charity that shares his name and is devoted to cancer awareness.
Just this week the Lance Armstrong Foundation announced plans for its 15th anniversary, and since it’s foundation the foundation is said to have raised $480 million, a good deal of money.
Will people abandon it after today’s damning report? A quick scan of Twitter finds many voicing support of Armstrong’s charity work, even if they are damning of his doping. It doesn’t appear that previous allegations have hurt the charity either — numbers provided by the foundation to ESPN suggest donations are up 5.7% in average dollar amount and 5.4% in quantity this year.
He’d get my credit if he was man enough to stand up and admit what he blatantly obviously has done
Say he made some bad choices, and face the punishment.
His legacy is going to be that of a liar and a cheat otherwise
He won’t get your credit you liar. You’re just one of those “Bandwagon” type. Jumped on cause you knew no better.
Face it. It was never put better than “The Christians had better odds against the Lions than athletes against the USADA”
What does that tell you?
The chap done alot for charity deserves more credit and less criticism.